Jump to content
Special Upgrade 4 Tech Tips

Dogface

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    568

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Dogface

    Forget Asymmetric Warfare! Ready for Transcendent Warfare?

    in General Discussion Forum

    Posted

    Kettler,

    According to Joe's book Mind Trek: Exploring Consciousness, Time, and Space Through Remote Viewing by Joseph McMoneagle, Hampton Roads, Publishing Co., Inc., 1997, p 216

    "I would be surprised if my percentage of "direct hits" were better than 20-25 percent. Also, if I reviewed those projects which I know fell within the percentage of "hits" (20 percentile), they would probably range from 5 to 95 percent correct information."

    And he said/worte this in 2006:

    ""Now, I’ve been doing RV for over thirty years and I’ve done tens of thousands of remote viewings of somewhat demanding importance, under incredible stress. In all of those RVs, I’ve experienced perhaps twelve or fifteen Ah-has, so that’s how rare they are. If you have a great deal of expectation for them they usually won’t occur; they usually happen when you least expect them."

    That looks to me like it is much less than the 65% you stated.

    0

    Forum pages opening at bottom of the page

    in General Discussion Forum

    Posted

    In the UserCP there is a

    Thread Display Mode

    When viewing a thread, you will be able to view the thread from a choice of four modes.

    1. Linear Mode (Oldest First) - In this mode, posts are displayed chronologically from oldest to newest. Posts are shown in a flat mode so that many posts can be viewed simultaneously.

    2. Linear Mode (Newest First) - This is the same as the above mode, except that posts are ordered in an opposite way (newest first).

    3. Threaded Mode - In this mode, a tree is shown along with every post. This tree allows you to see the relationship each post has to others, in terms of who responded to whom. Only one post is shown at a time.

    4. Hybrid Mode - This mode is a mixture of the linear and threaded modes. The post tree is displayed like in the threaded mode, but multiple posts are displayed simultaneously like in the linear modes.

    Mine is set to Linear Mode (Oldest First) and seems to work as expected. I will try the other setting, and Re-post.

    **confirmed when I set it to newest first then the newest post (this one) is at the top of the page. Is that what you mean??

    Also when I refresh the page it starts at Yskonyn's post at the bottom of the browser window.

    0

    Forum pages opening at bottom of the page

    in General Discussion Forum

    Posted

    To be honest, I'm not aware of any option here that can be set. Frankly, I'm also not sure if I understand what you mean. When I post, open pages etc. it's opening at the top of page. When I post replies etc., it's opening a page with the editor view only. Maybe it's your browser or a UserCP setting?

    I would guess browser or UserCP setting as mine seems to behave normaly.

    Edit to add;

    Yep after reply it jumped to my post. And after backing out to main Forum and then clicking on this post it starts at the top.

    0

    Any chance for Air Assault in the future?

    in Combat Mission Shock Force 1

    Posted

    I doubt it.

    A quick search for Helicopters and Member #42 got me:

    Don't get me wrong. It is possible for us to simulate hot LZs and fast roping, but for CM:SF it simply isn't a part of the scope of the simulated forces. And in general wouldn't be part of the scope of other forces within the CM:SF setting. A broader USMC/Airborne/Airmobile simulator, that covers generic combat scenario possibllities, perhaps. But considering the dubious tactical relevance and the high effort level needed to pull it off... we have zero plans to include it in any CM:SF realted release.

    Steve

    Remember kids the search button works.
    0

    More Army vehicles with the USMC Module?

    in Combat Mission Shock Force 1

    Posted

    Originally posted by Michael Dorosh:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Dogface:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />

    Originally posted by Dorosh

    Quite possible that "Firefly" was never used either, and JonS and the usual gang of CW Mafia had that discussion here also. Usual terminology was "17-pounder Sherman" or "Sherman Vc" if one wanted to get technical. I have a copy of the 1944 vehicle data book for 1st Canadian Army (a reprint) and the terms Wolverine, Firefly and Achilles are absent.

    That is because they were redacted by the reptoid aliens and Kris Kristofferson in a secret meeting under the Denver International Airport. </font>
    0

    More Army vehicles with the USMC Module?

    in Combat Mission Shock Force 1

    Posted

    Originally posted by Dorosh

    Quite possible that "Firefly" was never used either, and JonS and the usual gang of CW Mafia had that discussion here also. Usual terminology was "17-pounder Sherman" or "Sherman Vc" if one wanted to get technical. I have a copy of the 1944 vehicle data book for 1st Canadian Army (a reprint) and the terms Wolverine, Firefly and Achilles are absent.

    That is because they were redacted by the reptoid aliens and Kris Kristofferson in a secret meeting under the Denver International Airport.
    0
×
×
  • Create New...