Jump to content

Doodlebug

Members
  • Posts

    407
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Doodlebug

  1. First to say Mhflghub. That just has to mean thanks somehere in creation
  2. Managed to download your maps and have dipped into them and eyeballed just a fraction. Thay are, frankly, remarkable. Works of art! I can only thank you for taking the time to do these and release them for all to enjoy. From experience, on the rare occasion I've tried my hand at mapping it can be a real pain to finish and oh so time consuming. Greatly appreciate your efforts.
  3. Those are both remarkably beautiful pieces of work. Thank you for the continuing efforts.
  4. How about doing them when I need them for games I'm playing? Joking of course but they do look a bit special and I'm going to give them all a try as you roll them out. Thanks for the effort. It is appreciated.
  5. Your unit is a team (1 Sqd B)and I think IIRC the game does not rate teams highly in control calculations. Therefore the tank does "trump" the infantry. Would have been different if it was a squad in full on the objective as it would probably have been contested. I could be wrong but I imagine someone will be along shortly to point that out if I am wrong.
  6. Naah, you can lift 17 pounds, don't need a tractor. All the best, John. </font>
  7. You sure about that? Aren't we looking at a couple of FK297® based on the 76.2mm M1939 not the M1942 ZIS-3 (FK288®)? Also a couple of 122mm M1938's and for luck the tail end of a Pak40 front left? Think you're right about the 150's though. Regards.
  8. Crusader II, Gun Tractor Mk1. Used to tow 17lb At gun. The upper section looks pretty crudely welded on to me as does the welded shut(?) vision port to the right. "British and American tanks of World War 2" Chamberlain & Ellis. Photo P.39 P.38 "Side extensions could be fitted for deep wading in vehicles used by assault divisions used in Operation Overlord". Is this what we're looking at in the picture? The added superstructure above the original hull top has been quickly fastened into place for this purpose? Could it be the original waterproofing around the vision port yet to be removed rather than welded?
  9. There will be a twinkle in many an eye after folks grab this mod. Thanks once again.
  10. Oh my goodness. Now there's a beast I've never faced but I have a horrible feeling after people see these pictures they'll be appearing a lot more frequently. Awesome work BTW
  11. Those mods of yours just seem to get better and better. Love the shell strikes. Thanks for this awesome mod.
  12. Hmmmm. Note to self. Must use Tigers more. Thanks as always for a brilliant bit of work.
  13. Dear Lord. That's good. Thank you for another great mod.
  14. Oh my goodness. Those are just exquisite. I'm all tingly from the excitement. I think it's safe to say that everyone appreciates and looks forward to all your offerings. thanks again for a super mod.
  15. Wonderful work. Just in time to continue to take my command apart in my latest game.
  16. Cor. What a smasher. Thanks for the mod.
  17. Good Lord! Good job I was sitting down when I saw these. The excitement could have made me legs go wonky. Fantastic work. Thanks once again for the mods.
  18. all true but that's not answering the question. Why do the same size crews carry less for the gun with the higher ROF? Logic says faster firing = more bullets required (or at least as many as before)
×
×
  • Create New...