I've never actually read 'Forgotten Soldier' which really makes me an authority but if you've read 'Heaven and Hell : War Diary of a German Paratrooper'
by Martin Poppel and similar books, though they seem to be rare, I think you'll find alot of the supposed inconsistencies in 'Forgotten Soldier' to be quite common.
Just to pick one example from the critisism:
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Sajer's unit also never seems to have owned unit equipment -- they drive their trucks to the front, then are put on a train and, next thing we know, they are delivering supplies under fire using horse carts? These and so many other things tend to simply make the story fantastic.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
In Poppel's book this sort of thing seemed common. Also I think you're going to find personal accounts somewhat disjointed and lacking completeness, as you find with Poppel's. Taken in that context they're still worth the read.