<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Jeff Heidman:
I will re-iterate what someone has already mentioned: biggest is not always most important. The Eastern Front was decisive in WW2, but not because the Soviets managed to get 20+million people killed. I am not sure why exactly people think getting trully astonishing numbers of your sides people killed is an indicator of the importance of the fight.
Jeff Heidman
well for sure,this 20 million nbr includes non-combantants and non-Russian Soviets as well,but it is an indicator of the scale of that part of the war.I also indicates the Soviets wasted many of their troops in early part of the war.By summer 43,the Soviet battle tactics were changing,commanders were making better use of their troops and equipment and the casuality ratio was dropping.I for one,dont buy what captured German generals were saying about Soviet tactics,they,in some cases, made it sound like the soviets just used numbers to achieve their victory.Many German commanders didnt want to admit they were beaten by superior tactics,as well.Oh,they like to blame Hitler too.Read the author Glantz for a more balanced view of this war.
[This message has been edited by Jeff Heidman (edited 07-14-2000).]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>