Hi, Dumbo and Guys :
Ok, it is my turn to vote for the best
Generals to the WW II. My vote is :
1. Manstein
2. Rommel
3. Guderian
Below, is my personal point of view for
the famous generals of WW II :
* Manstein : Offensive skills : 99
Defendsive skills : 99
I think he is the best general during WW II, he took care the disaster after death of
6th army, he withdrew first, then made a counter-attack. What a general !! After
kurst, the German were in total withdrawal,
he maintained the German line in good shape
to avoid total destruction !!
* Rommel :
Offensive skills : 97
Defendsive skills : 97
He showed his military talent in WW I, and
he was really good in pursuit his enemies. But he advanced too fast, once he met guys like Monty, he will have a big trouble. Well,
I still consider he as a great general.
* Guderian : Offensive skills : 96
Defendsive skills : 96
Almost in the same level with Rommel, but I perfer to be Rommel because of his speed in
pursuiting his enemies. However, it is Guderian who gloried the Blitzkrieg, although he didn't invent the idea. He is really the
general know how to use the panzers. He knew
when to attack and when to withdraw, but Hilter didn't know about that at 1941 Russian
winter counterattack. That is why he was
forced to leave his 2nd Pz army, what a good
news to the Russians !!
* Zhukov : Offensive skills : 95
Defendsive skills : 95
With no doubt, he is the best general that
the Russia ever had !! But, he somehow learned his tactics from the Germans. However
, the artillery division really kicked German
's asses hard !! I really like this idea. If
you were Zhukov, whatelse can you do if you
face the world's best army, you can do nothing but feed them with your howizer and
cannon shells !!
* Patton : Offensive skills : 90
Defendsive skills : under 80
I think he the best American general !!
Although he has some short comings, he really
inspired the US tankers to make a dare advance in the weak German defensive line.
As one of his solider said : I rolled with
Patton !! About his defensive skills, I am
not sure about that, since I haven't read
much about his defensive warfare, but, he is
not good at defensive I believe.
* Monty : Offensive skills : under 85
Defendsive skills : 95
Unlike Patton, he is really good at defense
, but he didn't know when to pursuit his enemies with full speed. Otherwise, war in
N Africa will be ended earlier. By the way,
I think he made some bluffing after the
operation Market-Garden, he said (as I can
remember) he is good at maneuver warfare(?),
I am sorry UK folks, I totally disagree with
this. He is way too cautious to be a general
who is good at maneuver warfare(Blitzkreig).
He took too much time to prepare everything
for his attack, when you are increasing the
power of your attack, your enemies also have
enough time to increase their power to defend
. Kurst is the best example to show that if
you don't pursuit your enemies when they are
weak, if you wait for enough reinfoucement,
you are dooming your own army. Since , in
the mean time, your enemies also get re-
forcement, so, what do you think who gets
the the maxium advantatges ??
Ok, this is only my personal opinion, and
you are welcome to post your point of view,
BUT !!!! No abusive words, nor any anger can
be found here, we just discussed a simple
topic, not arguing with each other. PLEASE
respect other's idea.
Sgt. H
Male, 32, from Taiwan, now in the U.S.