Jump to content

meade95

Members
  • Posts

    481
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About meade95

  • Birthday 01/01/1978

Converted

  • Location
    NC

meade95's Achievements

Senior Member

Senior Member (3/3)

0

Reputation

  1. Thanks for reply! So a new modern CMSF-2 is going to come out for sure! Great to hear. Is there any ETA (ball park within Qtr of year).
  2. I use to play CMSF (all through NATO expansions). Though, I don't believe I was still playing when patch 1.30 finally came out. I have since long ago uninstalled CMSF.....but I'm thinking of repurchasing the CMSF/Marines pack...... Did 1.30 change the game much for most? I know I've read the patch list ......Just wondering how people felt the game played out after that long awaited patch. I think I remember being on 1.21 forever...
  3. So. If I'm still at Patch 1.21 (never saw the need to upgrate with what was fixed). But I do want Patch 1.32. I SHOULD Download 1.31 FIRST. Then do 1.32 (and then hopefully will not have to do a complete uninstall / reinstall of CMSF/MARINES/NATO.
  4. Look forward to this, if you make it - Not sure how CMSF plays out small scale operations like this (as is). I think CMSF could definitely do this well if BFC wanted it to with some small tweaks / added features. I'm looking to put something together with ARMA2 along this Ops lines...
  5. Would be a great gift if BFC could include the ability for US units to carry more gernades, smoke and demo charges.......In MOUNT conditions these are readily avaliable to any/all units conducting such operations today......They are in to limited a supply within CMSF (IMO). Now that CMSF is going out to pasture (more or less) it would be a nice if perhaps BFC could allow the community a little more leeway in what units have avaliable to them......with this last patch...
  6. More Demo charges for ALL units would be a great addition. All units in MOUNT combat have access to Demo charges (if needed). More gernades and more smoke are needed as well. Really wish this simple add on could be included in the last CMSF patch (1.31).
  7. LLF - Just DL, can't wait to try it out tomorrow when I have more time to think through my decisions - Though I have a question when looking via the editor - On your map I don't see any exact "set-up" zones - I was always under the impression that the AI needed / must have a setup zone to start out from. Guess I had this wrong.
  8. Could you buy two seperate Marine Batt's?? And cut down each from there?
  9. Been away with work for awhile - Very glad to see this one is finally about to be openly released! Great work LLF!
  10. There is lack of smoke, lack of gernades, lack of the ability of units to bring breaching charges. For MOUT Ops, I've never understood this situation not being addressed in some manner within CMSF throughout all the patches / exapansions.
  11. I still contend that BFC lost a tremendous secondary market with CMSF (by not putting in several SOF type dedicated / outfitted units with the NATO expansion). There is a whole sizable market of 'gammers' that don't go the CMSF route as is.....but would have jumped in, if such units were avaliable. This would could have been done with very little extra costs on BFC end (as all the attributes for the most part are already included within the engine). Simply reouttfitting a couple units, weapons wise, capability wise, etc. All the fixed costs were already there within CMSF. I believe BFC would have been surprised at the number of new customers that would have jumped in and bought CMSF + NATO had such units been included, just from my discussions on other forums of mainly FPS / RTS types.
  12. I like this idea - Put them in a building / area that is closed off to both OPFOR / BluFor - Where BluFor needs to break their way in -
  13. With CMSF-1 going to the way back burner - It would be nice if BFC would tweak up Sniper Teams overall observation ratings / performance - As this has been a years long discussion / request now.... which seems many are not happy with - And the idea of tweaking up status to "elite" just doesn't seem to do enough (in many customers views). Perhaps an additional tweak up in ratings above where it stands now (for elite) could finally happen with the last patch of 1.32? This would have no negative effect to users - As only those wishing / believing their should be a performance increase for such units would then use this "elite" status.
  14. With respect, if you believe Saddam came to power because of (or had anything to do with) the CIA, that just isn't accurate. Saddam came to power via himself, squarly. He was a self made dictator if there ever was one.... The guy was banished from Iraq for a period of his life (sent off to exile in Egypt/Jordan) only to return via his own efforts. Absoutely nothing to do with the U.S. And that is a long growing fable regarding UBL and the CIA. He was nothing within the mojahedin which with the CIA worked in the 80s. His legend has been greatly exxaggerated in that period. As for the idea of the US being stretched because of the GWOT. While I'll agree, it is fact that professionals think logistics, logistics, logistics...while the amatuer thinks tactics......I think what the GWOT proved....was it wasn't the US who couldn't fight an effective, prolonged multi-front war.....it was AQ who couldn't.
×
×
  • Create New...