dragoon19

Cool topic, one comment regarding Greenland. The Danish ambassador in Washington gave US base right on Greenland and thus disregarded instructions from German occupied Copenhagen. Perhaps Greenland should go to US if Denmark is invaded and US joins the war.

Good Fun!

I like the basic thought of a Russian follow up attack at the western allies. If nothing else it will give the allied players something new to think about as the war against Germany is finishing. However, why not make it an option for all Allied players? Why should the US/UK player not be given the option of finishing of the”red menace” while their soldiers are in mainland Europe anyway?

Hi Kuniworth, Spent some time in Tallinn two years ago. Did some battle field tourisme east of the city. The Russian attack and the German defence in that region is really crazy stuff on a wast scale. The Estonians can still pull out T34 and all kinds of equipment and explosives out of the ground out there. Have a nice time in Tallinn, and drink some Saku beer for me...

That is so cool! I really like the ice. One quick comment on Greenland! Greenland is Danish territory. Should Germany invade Denmark the neutrality of the Greenland landmass should change in some way. I suggest that when the US enters the war the Greenland landmass should go to the US. Also historically Iceland was Danish at the time. Iceland used the Germany occupation of Denmark to declare independence, and I think they made some sort of agreements with the US. Historical note. The Danish ambassador to the US made a deal with the US. This meant that US could use Greenland for among other weather stations and airbases etc. The deal was made in 1941 despite the wishes of the Danish government in Copenhagen. The deal was later approved when Denmark was liberated from German occupation.

There is a huge difference between the two types of LEO, in terms of the fire control systems. The list of tanks mentioned seems to treat them as one and the same? which one will be in the game?

Don´t know if this been up before on the forum, but I think it could be a nice feature if it was possible to have 2 allied players vs the axis in a SC2 game. One allied playe would control the USSR and another the USA+UK+France. Part of the thinking behind this is also that each of the two allied sides should have somewhat different victory goals - besides the destruction of the Axis. In this way while the overall situation would be say a allied victory with the destruction of the axis. The USSR could emerge as the dominant and get a overall first place among the allies if it managed to grab Central and Eastern Europe as well as say Greece, Denmark and Norway. With the US+UK+France in a second place. This would perhaps create some tensions among the allied players that I think could add anoter dimension to the game. Possible a quick round og WWIII Comments?

Don´t know if this been up before on the forum, but I think it could be a nice feature if it was possible to have 2 allied players vs the axis in a SC2 game. One allied playe would control the USSR and another the USA+UK+France. Part of the thinking behind this is also that each of the two allied sides should have somewhat different victory goals - besides the destruction of the Axis. In this way while the overall situation would be say a allied victory with the destruction of the axis. The USSR could emerge as the dominant and get a overall first place among the allies if it managed to grab Central and Eastern Europe as well as say Greece, Denmark and Norway. With the US+UK+France in a second place. This would perhaps create some tensions among the allied players that I think could add anoter dimension to the game. Possible a quick round og WWIII Comments?

Why not just make partisans increase the cost of movement in certain states in western europe. so that if UK has partisan tech level 1 there would be +5 per cent increase in transport cost. level 2 +10 per cent etc. that way 'partisan tech' would be workable in all of the European area of operations. This would simulate low level partisan war. dragoon19

started with CM but these days its mostly SC. Both Great games.

looks nice - testing has begun.

both

Denmark is the key to going in or out of the Baltic Sea. Putting sea mines around the Danish island is a easy trick stopping all allied movement in and all german out. IMO anyone in control of DK should be able to close the Baltic.

dragoon19(axis bid 150) lost to IrishGuards Dragoon19

As I understand it Hitler had a tour of the WWI and did´t like gas on bit. As such Hitlers experience in WWI shaped a large part of his understanding of command in WWII and he was against the use of gas even if it could have been useful from a military point of view. However the topic is good as it poses guite alot of "what if's". Dragoon19