Elmar Bijlsma Posted May 21, 2010 Share Posted May 21, 2010 G3, are you sure? Could be, they look similar enough, but looked like FN FAL to me in the screenshots. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dima Posted May 21, 2010 Share Posted May 21, 2010 In real life most insurgents and certainly regular armies carry a lot more anti-tank RPG rounds than anti-personnel. The reason is that it is much more important to be able to disable enemy vehicle when one appears and also because HEAT RPG rounds can still be very lethal against infantry. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damian90 Posted May 21, 2010 Share Posted May 21, 2010 Maybe damage isn't overmodeled perhaps but certain units are under modeled? (Such as the standard M1A2 and standard M2A3) The thing I can suggest is that tracks and sights should not be damage if they aren't hit directly (especially tracks) or very near (sights). Armor is modelled properly, if we consider our current knowledge and the best estimates, but estimates are only estimates, frontal armor protection of best MBT's is probably better than we think... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.