JonS Posted May 11, 2010 Share Posted May 11, 2010 I'd like to see a lot more information about why it might be considered "folly" before leaping to support such a position. Well, that would be Traver's book ('Gallipoli 1915'), Prior's book ('Churchill's "World Crisis" as History'), and Erickson's article ('One more push: forcing the Dardanelles in March 1915') Jon 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stalins Organ Posted May 11, 2010 Share Posted May 11, 2010 If the summary can only present the amount of ammunition mentioned on a couple of pages as Travers' evidence of "folly" then IMO there's no need to buy that particular work! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Affentitten Posted May 11, 2010 Author Share Posted May 11, 2010 Jesus. I can't believe I'm agreeing with SO for about 3 posts in a row now! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonS Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 hehe - no trouble leaping to that conclusion on next to no information though, eh? *shrug* 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stalins Organ Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 What conclusion? That I would like more information to come to a conclusion? That's the sort of conclusion more people should leap to IMO! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.