FanzerPaust Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 I can run faces of war on my computer with no problem. not even when it gets very busy on the field its still running very good. Now my question is. Is TOW so much more heavy as a game then FOW? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodstar44 Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Originally posted by FanzerPaust: I can run faces of war on my computer with no problem. not even when it gets very busy on the field its still running very good. Now my question is. Is TOW so much more heavy as a game then FOW? My take is yes... The map is really big and if all goes into RAM hmmmm you get it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panzermartin Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Tanks dont only kill my infantry but my CPU as well. Does TOW processing take into account mass weight? I cant enjoy scenarios with more than 8-9 tanks rolling at the same time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panzermartin Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 I have 1 gig of RAM. I'm curious if others with the same RAM ammount can play the game to the max? No unplayable frame rates though. Rest is a decent machine I think. P4® D dual core 2.8 Geforce 7600GT XP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanzerPaust Posted April 25, 2007 Author Share Posted April 25, 2007 i just asked this because of the fact that fow works great and tow doesnt, and i wondered if thats the heavyness of the game, or something else. because in my opinion fow is also not a small game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts