FanzerPaust

??? WTF, i am always with respect in my messages. Been online waiting day by day for 2 weeks now, let alonw the months before the release just waiting. never lost interest in the game. Asked many questions you didnt even answer correctly. Every guy that spits in this forum because he is to frustrated to talk normal, gets a message back that he should watch it. What do you expect from people who payed a days work earning on the game, but maybe im lucky i didnt even buy the game yet. Question my intensions? what should i want then? You think i started posting here for fun? And no Mattmat, i question you... For not respecting the intelligence of people who pay money to keep you guys at work. I give up, had it with you answers. BYE! [ April 27, 2007, 03:08 AM: Message edited by: FanzerPaust ]

show me one, name me one poster here that has the minimum req and the game works good.

hey, does this al mean that the minimun requirements is much higher then the one you put on the battlefront site? it seems you are only working on the dual, one cpu only option. so im waiting for a patch that doesnt come? bullocks if this is so. or may I aks the question again? what is it that you guys are trying to fix with a patch in the game. all the people who have problems with the fps when more troops come in, hace pc's that are better then the minimum required pc's please respond, is it to any use that we wait for a patch? or are the minimum requirements not realistic.

i just asked this because of the fact that fow works great and tow doesnt, and i wondered if thats the heavyness of the game, or something else. because in my opinion fow is also not a small game.

Please guys, update, is there going to be a patch???

Ok, missed that, sorry

I can run faces of war on my computer with no problem. not even when it gets very busy on the field its still running very good. Now my question is. Is TOW so much more heavy as a game then FOW?

Battlefront guys, is there any update aboute the patch?

Yes in the ww map, i put every option with a number on 1. shading, everything. still fps were low when heavy warfare begins. Because of the number changes i didnt even see the tanks, so its not a model issue or something like that.

SIO, with all do respect, but are you guys reading the forum? everybody has the new drivers, and almost no one has an intel integrated card.

Amd 2400 nvidida 6200 256 mb 1,5 ghz ram m audio card good until russians come in, then 2-6 fps

seems that they should have tken an extra year for progress. thought this was the most realistic in its sort, reading this i doubt that.

well il2 runs fine on my pc, on full this doesnt run good on my pc all on lowest

i think its the same problem lots of us have, nothing to do but wait. will be fixed, cant imagine otherwise