kipanderson Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Hi, Is the underlying armour modelling as detailed in CMSF/CMX2 as in CMX1? On the face of it there has been a huge reduction in the detail of the armour modelling from CMX1. We no longer see the penetration figures for given weapons and rounds nor the thickness/type of armour for each part of an AFV. Just four or five ratings from excellent to poor. But under the hood is the armour modelling as detailed in CMX2 as in CMX1? Is the exact type/thickness/slope at the point struck….and so on… still taken into account? How is armour penetration modelling in CMX2… behind the scenes? All good fun, All the best, Kip. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.