Tank Ace Posted September 30, 2003 Share Posted September 30, 2003 Dear Battlefront.com, I have noticed a few "errors" in CMBO that i would like to express nicely. There really more of an annoyance. My annoyance is the accuracy of Stuart and Greyhound armor vehicles that can hit tigers that are on the move from 700m away and veteran and crack tigers that can't hit a churchhill from 700m away. I was woundering if that is realistic or a game flaw. I find it to be annoying that my tiger can't even hit a stuart or sherman in some cases from 700m away but the stuart's shells can bounce off of the tiger from 700-1000m away. If this is a flaw i would just like you to consider it in CMAK, which i know will be great! I realize that Im probably not the first person to complain about this but just wondering why that is. Best of luck, TANK ACE 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWB Posted October 1, 2003 Share Posted October 1, 2003 This will not be as much of an issue in CMAK, which is based on CMBB. Moving tanks rarely hit anything, even at nearly point blank range. Even with gyros (which apparently were generally removed anyhow). WWB 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Dorosh Posted October 1, 2003 Share Posted October 1, 2003 Originally posted by wwb_99: This will not be as much of an issue in CMAK, which is based on CMBB. Moving tanks rarely hit anything, even at nearly point blank range. Even with gyros (which apparently were generally removed anyhow). WWB It's my understanding the gyrostabilizer only maintained the vertical aspect of the gun; the gunner still had to traverse as needed. There was a lot of talk about over-modelling gyrostabilizers in GI: Anvil of Victory. One point made in The General was that tank crews didn't have time to train with the gyrostabilizer and thus as you point out they were discarded in many cases. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klapton Posted October 1, 2003 Share Posted October 1, 2003 The Tiger is a big target, has slow rate of fire and relatively low velocity gun. The Stuart is small, has better rate of fire, and I guess superior muzzle velocity (I don't remember). Run a test several times to see if you get a big difference between Tiger and Allied tanks accuracy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Los Posted October 1, 2003 Share Posted October 1, 2003 "My annoyance is the accuracy of Stuart and Greyhound armor vehicles that can hit tigers that are on the move from 700m away and veteran and crack tigers that can't hit a churchhill from 700m away." Well you know what they say: "On any given Sunday..." Los 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.