Kingfish Posted March 14, 2004 Share Posted March 14, 2004 How does one accurately depict the commonwealth practice of LOB in CM? For instance, take a full strength CW infantry battalion 1940 model assigned to an attack. Would it have all 4 rifle companies on the line, but each platoon set at 80% strength? Or all platoons at full strength, but one platoon per company removed? Or only 3 full strength companies on the line? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John D Salt Posted March 14, 2004 Share Posted March 14, 2004 Originally posted by Kingfish: How does one accurately depict the commonwealth practice of LOB in CM? For instance, take a full strength CW infantry battalion 1940 model assigned to an attack. Would it have all 4 rifle companies on the line, but each platoon set at 80% strength? Or all platoons at full strength, but one platoon per company removed? Or only 3 full strength companies on the line? A flat-rate percentage across the whole organization would seem more reasonable to me. Re-squadding to reduce the number of rifle companies would I think typically only be done after suffering casualties (as shown, for example, in the war diaries of 1/5, 1/6 and 1/7 Queen's in Normandly, each of which at some point in the campaign went to an orbat with 3 rifle companies). All the best, John. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Dorosh Posted March 14, 2004 Share Posted March 14, 2004 Originally posted by Kingfish: How does one accurately depict the commonwealth practice of LOB in CM? For instance, take a full strength CW infantry battalion 1940 model assigned to an attack. Would it have all 4 rifle companies on the line, but each platoon set at 80% strength? Or all platoons at full strength, but one platoon per company removed? Or only 3 full strength companies on the line? All companies would usually be present; rifle sections in the case of my regiment, according to battle questionnaires filled out by platoon and company commanders, usually had 5 men or so, that's almost 50 percent. http://members.shaw.ca/calgaryhighlanders/18pn.htm Here's one example - 18 Platoon of the Calgary Highlanders on 17 Aug 1944. 22 men on strength, all ranks, sections led by Lance Jacks, and a Lance Corporal taking over as platoon sergeant. 5 men per rifle section - before LOBs! [ March 15, 2004, 02:53 AM: Message edited by: Michael Dorosh ] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonS Posted March 15, 2004 Share Posted March 15, 2004 Incidentally, by late war (say, mid-late 44 onwards) in Italy the British weren't recieving enough reinforcements to sustain their infantry battalions. As a result, they went to a three company org permanently. AFAIK this did not affect the other CW nations. I know it didn't affect the Kiwis. I doubt it affected the Canadians or the South Africans. It may have affected the British battalions in Indian Army divisions, but probably not the Indian battalions. Regards JonS 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.