lwchen Posted December 16, 2002 Share Posted December 16, 2002 Using the original 1.06 patch, I have a French battleship that will not loop around Africa. It just sits there on the red arrow. Been there since 1941 (it's 1944 now). France fell in 1940 and this battleship was the only naval vessel that joined Britain. It has zero supply though ... perhaps that is why it won't make the trip to the Suez. Or maybe it's a bug. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
82ndReady Posted December 16, 2002 Share Posted December 16, 2002 My understanding that was only for Troop transportation not Naval ships! I to have stationed Naval ships there and nothing happens, after reading the rules on how to use the loop it mentions troops not naval units. Hope this helps? :confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emil Seibold Posted December 16, 2002 Share Posted December 16, 2002 Yeah-troop ships only, not warships. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuniworth Posted December 16, 2002 Share Posted December 16, 2002 >>>Emil Where did you fight?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
82ndReady Posted December 17, 2002 Share Posted December 17, 2002 Emil Seibold where are you from? How old are you, when did you serve? You would be at least 80+ years old if you were in WWII???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lwchen Posted December 17, 2002 Author Share Posted December 17, 2002 Ah Ok thanks. But why not warships? Are they too big to fit through the canal? This would be an excellent way for the Allies to shore up their Mediterranean fleet in anticipation of an Axis invasion of Egypt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyJohn Posted December 17, 2002 Share Posted December 17, 2002 Originally posted by Emil Seibold: "Yeah-troop ships only, not warships." Whatever . . . Fine, Emil, now how about making another posting in the forum you started where a lot of others who used to get along are presently at each other's throats defending and attacking your remarks or, more accurately your right to have come out with them. Some of us are still interested in hearing what you have to say, which so far has been scant little in relation to the disention it's caused. Or, was that the intention all along, as some of the contributors have been claiming? Also, the Sig Heil doesn't help; it's no longer an accepted greeting and makes it harder for others to support you. I for one don't appreciate being labelled a nazi for having given moral to support to someone who doesn't have the decency to either finish what he started or the self-respect to defend himself. I'm also posting this to the forum you've begun, where a few of us have our butts hanging out waiting for you to pop back in. -- * -- Very pleased to say this posting is now a moot issue. Emil has made that other posting and has not disappointed any of his supporters. He's a brave man who has done something good and right at the risk of exposing himself to ridicule, and it was something he was in no way obligated to do. He deserves our respect. [ December 17, 2002, 04:04 PM: Message edited by: JerseyJohn ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
82ndReady Posted December 18, 2002 Share Posted December 18, 2002 JERSEYJOHN where was this other thread at if I may ask??? :confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyJohn Posted December 18, 2002 Share Posted December 18, 2002 82nd Ready -- Sorry -- thanks for asking. It's worth going to, a real free for all and a lot of opposing opinions. The last few entries have been particularly informative. As usual I take on my notorius nazi identity! The Forum: Follow on from Political Debate etc. . . .. [ December 17, 2002, 06:11 PM: Message edited by: JerseyJohn ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts