GhostAgent Posted December 13, 2000 Share Posted December 13, 2000 Do you think that routed or broken squads should have a chance to automatically "split"? Or do you think this would serve no purpose... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingfish Posted December 13, 2000 Share Posted December 13, 2000 I can't think of any benefits to splitting them. They are uncontrollable until they recover (if at all), so you'll end up with two units doing nothing. Also, split units are in a more fragile state than full strength units, so the recovery phase might end up taking longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walter Posted December 13, 2000 Share Posted December 13, 2000 I think that the poster was proposing that as a consequence of being broken or routed, rather than the squad sticking together, half the guys decided to take off one way, half the other and therefore that there were in fact *more* negative consequences to their having broken. An interesting idea, but I don't know what purpose it would serve in the larger sense, except to make them more difficult to put somewhere useful. And God knows that's already hard enough Cheers, Walter R. Strapps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juardis Posted December 14, 2000 Share Posted December 14, 2000 <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by GhostAgent: Do you think that routed or broken squads should have a chance to automatically "split"? Or do you think this would serve no purpose...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Great idea! Maybe even instead of breaking they split. Like they have a 50% chance to split and remain unbroken OR a 50% chance to break as a whole. If it's really really bad, they do both. I like it. ------------------ Jeff Abbott Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts