Zeleban

Russia has never stated that it was going to attack the United States. However, she constantly claims that she is ready to attack Europe On the contrary, recently we have seen significant “uncomfortability” for the United States in supporting Ukraine. The conflict between the US and Russia could easily turn nuclear. Therefore, the United States will not go to war with Russia, even if it attacks Europe

OK Exactly the same "uncomfortable" may arise after Russia attacks other countries. This is why more and more countries are no longer believing in the United States. It is precisely because of this “uncomfortable”

Actually, the “reluctance” you described above is a consequence of fear. Exactly the same reluctance may arise after Russia attacks other countries. This is why more and more countries are no longer believing in the United States. It is precisely because of this “reluctance”

Your post raises even more questions than before. If everything is exactly as you described, then why is the West afraid of Russia? Why do more and more allies of the West not trust it and believe that it is better to rely on their own strengths than on the support of the West?

This is a very real development of events in the event of the fall of Ukraine

Yes, this is exactly what thousands of Chechen fighters did after the defeat from Russia, despite all the atrocities that Russia committed on the territory of Chechnya. Putin will have many ways to do this. However, one of the most important is money. If you cannot feed your family in a dilapidated and plundered country, then you will gladly go to war even to the ends of the earth against anyone. This is exactly what thousands of Russian volunteers do today when they join the Russian army.

This is not true, at the moment Russia is keeping most of the world in fear. How can Russia be called a secondary state after this?

In the event of the fall of Ukraine, Russia will have hundreds of thousands of well-trained and combat-experienced fighters - former soldiers of the Ukrainian army. It’s not true, you then had loyal allies in France and Great Britain

Yes, but there are also common features in these events - the lack of clear and decisive actions to ensure the security of one’s borders, both air and ground

Only against an enemy ready for defense (including morally) and entrenched. Let me remind you that the depth of penetration of mechanized columns deep into Ukraine at the beginning of the war amounted to tens of kilometers per day (in areas not ready for defense). But what about working in a team, negotiations among alliance members, etc.? And by the way, no one is saying that Russia needs to fight a war on two fronts. This can be implemented immediately after the defeat of Ukraine

As I understand it, the subsequent hasty bringing of Poland’s air defense to full combat readiness is the implementation of the work of “actual defensive layers”

How long will it take Russian mechanized columns to cross the territory of Estonia? How long will it take for NATO “team players” to consult in the event of Russian aggression? I feel great, by the way I'm not your brother

And NATO's reaction is... ? I hope you understand that with these actions Russia is testing NATO's resolve. This will be important for deciding on aggression against some NATO countries. Nobody seems to have noticed the recent crash of the Shahed drone on Romanian territory, and now we have a violation of Polish airspace. I wonder why Polish air defense didn’t shoot down this missile? Perhaps they were afraid of offending Russia by shooting down one of its missiles

Great, now we have a new route for Russian missile attacks on Ukraine - from Polish territory. As I understand it, there will be no serious reaction to this incident from Poland.

The same. I only found out about the attack in the morning when I woke up as usual

here is the updated information

In general, in my opinion, missile attacks on Ukrainian cities today play a negative role for the Russians. Russia today is conducting one of the most successful information and psychological campaigns against the Ukrainian state. The Kremlin has successfully undermined Ukrainians' faith in its leadership and is quite successful in countering the mobilization of Ukrainians, pitting them against military officials. However, massive attacks on rear cities reduce the effectiveness of these informational and psychological actions, returning Ukrainians to reality and indicating who their true enemy is.

Tonight was the most massive missile attack on Ukraine in recent times. However, it is still weaker than last year’s attacks, when the number of missiles reached 100

Hey, it turns out there are sober-minded officials in the West

Ukrainian soldiers began to receive Tsukorok (sugar) drone detectors. This detector scans the radio air and, based on the characteristic frequency at which a certain type of drone is controlled, determines that there is a drone nearby and you need to hide. Allegedly, this device is inexpensive, and its effectiveness has already been tested by soldiers on the front line.

It would be funny if next year we saw a change in the rhetoric of Western politics from “Ukraine must not lose” to “Russia must win.” At least in this case, many people in the West would finally sleep peacefully: Russia's nuclear weapons remained in the possession of Russia itself. But seriously, why are some people in the West not afraid that nuclear weapons are in the possession of a state that has repeatedly threatened to wipe out Western civilization, but instead are very afraid of the mythical "Warlord of Novosibirks"?