Weer
-
Posts
92 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Weer
-
-
You aren't going to eliminate all of the Tomahawks in a well coordinated strike
So if will be the MoD of US you will send all USN to the black sea? Just to berry them there due to backfire raid?
-
Indeed. New age warfare.
-
impressive tomahawk strike
Tomahawks are too slow and can be intercepted with ease even with Osa SAM.
But turning back to my question - how NATO side will counter low altitude CAS? US dont have any AA for that, manpads are actualy the last chance weapon, not the main one. UA AA are old and not realy numerus.
-
stealth B2 bombers
That is realy questional statement))
As for other, Libyan AA were something like mid 70s USSR. Plus they dont have any strategic AA assets like S-300 and S-400.
-
Many experts feel Russian air defences and air forces could be taken out in a few weeks.
Question is how many NATO planes will remain functional after this?
-
The US only has Stingers for AA
That is MANPAD with a very limited range.
NATO would quickly gain air superiority
Why? Russian army have more SAMs when anyone.
-
I have litle question about tactics - how US plan to fight with the russian choppers and CAS planes flyng on low altitude?
-
Why i didnt see any proofs in this post?
-
BTR +1
Виктор Иванович Мураховский
Is he fighting as volunteer? Have he ever been in UA?
-
Putin also didn't seem to know it because he said they were Ukrainians who bought all the equipment on eBay.
He is the politic.
Modern Russian Federation equipment being viewed by OSCE monitors who are, by any reasonable definition, useless.
They are OSCE.
If you dont respect them thats your problem.
so who was driving it
Militants?
Thats the same BTR-80 but with different gun. 2A72 are used on some UA vehicles.
So whats the problem?
And yeas, RF give to the militants.
Surrounding Ukrainian military bases, the airport, the ferry crossings, etc.
Anyway that took place only after Crimean parlament said "cya" to the UA.
Documents
Where?
Show us some of them pls.
Putin even had to admit that some were Russian military
Is he said "regular troops with orders from MoD"?
-
Please tell me more about which ethnicities are reliable and which are sure to kowtow to occupiers.
I know ukrainians personally. Thats not a joke - this is part of theyr culture.
-
I cant believe this is being used as an argument
Why it cant?
You can reffer to ANY war what took place on the territory of the UA. They are not those glorius Belarus partisans and even the Russian ones. They have sayng "моя хата с краю" what means if something doesnt touch me i will not do anything to it.
They are not Kurds. They will cooperate.
-
A Russian commander who assumes that he won't have problems with the Ukrainian population is going to get a lot of his men killed.
As history shown us ukrainians will cooperate with occupation forces.
-
I don't understand this comment.
My bad, sorry.
When Crimean events were happening everyone knows what there were russian troops in center of them. Even in Russia.
Like this?
Title says what there is OSCE dudes were close. If they said what thats okay - thats okay.
but also BTR-82 and T-72s
Well not all of the gear is 20 years old, but still you have no evidence what they manned by russian regulars.
So when the Green Men appeared you were saying "hey, we have illegally invaded Ukraine"?
Russia used its right to keep about 60K (i dont remember the correct number) in Crimea.
if there is a Russian soldier in Ukraine is either waging an illegal war of aggression or is a terrorist?Only IF there is regulars.
If they dont recive orders from MoD they are terrorists. If they do - Ukraine must declare a war to Russia.
But only if there are regulars.
Now why is that?Who knows?
Fact is that the DPR and LPR were created by Russians and was led by RussiansStill no evedences.
And yes they are russians, Ethnic russains.
-
Is that a challenge for political discussion?
I can stop but only if Steve will stop call other points of view "Putin's propaganda".
-
You live in a country whose state sponsored media says that the CIA was behind the Paris terrorist attacks
What a shame, Steve. US porpaganda mashine said that?
Your leaders and your media lied about the invasion of Crimea by Russian forces
But evryone in russia know what there is actualy our troops there. Now - we dont.
not reality
Who give you the right to call some thing "reality" and other "propaganda"?
You probably also believe that the CIA is behind the Paris terrorist attack because you saw it on Life News
I didnt watch LF and i dont know anyone of my friends doing so.
Our state controlled media never said what that was CIA operation. That the IS do that but IS creation is the US fault.
But for the fun of it, what do you make of this "20 year old gear"?For example counter-battary gear or UR-77 seen in use by militants.
So if an American force, directed and equipped by the American government, started killing Russians on Russian soil you would not view that as an invasion?
If they will wear US unform and recive official orders - that the war. If not - that the terrorism.
Learn law of war.
Libya was a civil war with open admission of support for one side by US and European countries
DNR and LNR asked for help from Russia.
-
The evidence of regular Russian military having fought in Ukraine is overwhelming
There is none.
Yeah we have some fotos of 20 years old gear in hands of militants and some upgraided tanks but thats it. Yeah russia give it to the militants just like NATO did it with FSA or Libian rebels.
But there is no clear evedince of regular troops fighting there.
-
Well, I guess they feel that if a lie is repeated enough times then it becomes fact.
So you are tryng to say what there were no russian regulars?
-
In glorious "raid"
The fun thing what there is no evedence of this raid.
-
What is "Polish PMC"?
Mercs from Poland. Militants says much about them during the whole airoport events.
And that is this is a weapon that is only in use with Russia and not Ukraine, therefore it can only be in Ukraine if it came from Russia.
Second foto is the Ukrainian solder.
I belive UA have some of them for theyr SF units.
-
Don't you think this "Cyborg" is going use the Russian KSVK (6C8) 12.7mm sniper rifle he captured a few days ago, or do you think he's going to send it back to Russia?
That rifle were captured from the Cyborgs in the last airport fight. And it belived what Polish PMC are used them.
http://cs623324.vk.me/v623324269/2d14/qqYxiivbGbs.jpg
That foto have been made a month ago.
-
nucleus
Если вы говорите про ядро ака движущую силу, то должны писать "core"))
-
so-called 'peace keepers'
And what so-called "UN" thinks about that?
-
What is acceptable behavior on other Forums is generally not acceptable here.
Yeah sorry.
But i crushed my chear when i saw you answer and my reaction was uncontrolled.
I'll turn the question around to you. How many do you think they have produced? It seems from your previous comments you think the number is 0.
Nope.
Something like 70 in total with the old versions of T-64 form the "stockpiles".
That is a very difficult position to believe.Thats's what i think about your position.
They dont have money for that. Kharcovs plant arealmost dead all its good engeneirs are reataired are long ago coz they have no payment for they work during 2000s.
UA need at least 5 year to rebuild its military industry, but they can do it only if they will have a realy huge money bag. Thats simple.
Please provide your sources that Ukraine has not been repairing and restoring vehicles into service.
I never said something like that.
All i said what they didnt do it in right numbers ever for they CTO. And as Kalugin said they dont only need good stuff, they need motivated and trained professionals with at least 6 month training. Current UA consripts have only 3.
You can start by citing your sources that shows that the 2S7 'Pion' I have seen in many reports, and pictures, are not in service.The fun thing what UA president said what they catualy produse them. lol
Using your logic, Russia had better not get into a war with the US, not to mention the US and NATO. Even France could fight Russia to a draw, again based on your argument.And that is true.
Russia cant won all out WW2 style war against NATO and even US. US just have more cannon folder.
So why is Russia accepting non-Russians into its military? There must be a reason for this decision, yes?To have more proffesioanls.
Like it happend in US. In France. In UK.
Thats normal for the modern world.
If you don't want to even try to challenge a statement, do not bother to reply with something this childish.I have many friend in Ukraine. One of them from Crimea, some from Kharov and one from Kiev. I know what they are thinking about.
Some of them hate Putin but all of them hate Poroshenko due to total idiotism of his goverment.
Strategic and tactical realities in CMBS
in Combat Mission Black Sea
Posted
In past few days they manneged to capture some buldings. And yes biggest part of AP is now under militants control.