Jump to content

Saferight

Members
  • Posts

    851
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Saferight

  1. On 2/18/2017 at 4:40 PM, akd said:

    Sturmpanzer Abteilung 216 had a platoon of 5x Pz II at this time, an addition unique to this battalion.  The photo is not staged, but from a series of the Sturmpanzer battalion moving past an immobilized Tiger of Schwere Panzer Abteilung 508.

    37mm Pak 36 is in CMFI as an option for the Fallschirmjager regimental AT company.

    Yeah when i was putting this album together i was surprised to see the Sturmpanzer Units had Panzer IIs attached. What would have been the reasoning been behind that? Similar reason as to why the kind of early Tiger units had Panzer IIINs perhaps?

  2. Until now I have seen pictures of BTR-80, BMP-2 and BTR-4E with cage armor kits on. Maybe this is not a huge difference, but I belive that these variants could be of some use on the field in CMBS.

    I asked about this awhile back and Mikey Ds reply was they were against slat armor being added to the Ukr vehicles because of the amount of tandem warhead at weapons in-game would make it pointless. I kinda agree...

    It makes sense with the amount of PG7VRs in the Russian inf squads but with uncons added there would be a situation where slat would be worthwhile. See with uncons and their mix of kit you would see much more single stage rpgs in their hands like PG7VL VM V and just a few VR here and there depending on equipment quality.

    The added workload might be a pita for Bfc so i would be suprised if they change their opinion in the future.

  3. Agreed on unconventional forces for both sides with older equipment (i.e. BMP-1s, ZU-23-2s, gun-trucks, etc.); and also VDV/USMC in order to add elite light infantry force with unique equipment for both sides.While I am certainly not opposed to Ukrainian National Guard (as in former Interior Troops) either; it would be much more difficult to find a unique niche for them; as they mostly share their OOB with other BTR-based infantry units.

    They do have some unique kit like a different version of the t-64B1M and variety of armored mrap type vehicles.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equipment_of_the_National_Guard_of_Ukraine

  4. Yes and from what i read cost was a big factor in the quality of the materials mainly the polymers used. if i remember correctly H&K used lower quality polymers than were spec'd originally. this all has shattered my idea of the G36 being this expensive uber futuristic rifle.

    some are saying the 416 would be the best choice for a replacement but i think that would be way too expensive. Is it even possible to refurbish these rifles?

  5. The problem of the G36 seems to be that during fully automatic fire, the barrel heats up and the plastic parts get soft, reducing accuracy. Tests that were conducted by the BW showed that after 90 shots of fully automatic fire, accuracy drops drastically, rendering the weapon ineffective at ranges beyond 100-150 meters. Many blamed HK for the shortcomings, but in fact the G36 in its standard version met exactly the specifications of the BW when it was introduced. The MG36 was developed for continous fully automatic fire, not the standard version of the rifle. That is why the MG36 has a much heavier barrel. There were also reports of the excessive heat development beeing the result of faulty ammunation, which was confirmed by the manufacturer of that ammo and some 70.000 rounds of the german troops in Afgahnistan were replaced by ammunation from a different manufacturer. But still the BW seems to be unsatisfied with the performance of the G36.

     

    As far as i knnow, the BW is currently looking for either and updated version of the G36 or an entirely new weapon. I dont know if it has been decided yet what they are going to do.

    German Defense Minister: G36 Has “No Future” With Bundeswehr

    http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2015/04/23/german-defense-minister-g36-has-no-future-with-bundeswehr/

     

    effected by even ambient temperatures :eek: . how this took so long to finally come to light is interesting....

  6. I hate to use these guys for example but look at all the footage from the middle east over the past few years. Truck mounted weapons in that high threat environment are used in shoot n' scoot tactics basically popping the vehicles from cover to deliver a few bursts then quickly haul ass back to defilade.Thats how i try to use my HMMVs and Tigrs in CMBS. 

     

    Whether its in a urban area or the countryside the longer they stay exposed the more chance of that gunner getting clipped or the whole vehicle blown. They are basically a very mobile soft target with a big friggin red arrow o' death on top of the gunners head. When i have my gunners killed its usually cause i drove them out into situation where i shouldn't have. Also 400m or 250m really aint that much to the small arms in CMBS or in real life.

  7. The firefight in the first video is insanley intense. Love the guy with the PTRS. I wonder how effective this would be in combat.

    Ya but do you notice the lack of backblast discipline in that fight? The camera man seemed to learn his lesson though hiding indoors for the next RPG shot LOL

     

    Not very effective in combat but i have to say handling a nearly 7 foot long rifle thats about 50 lbs like that is impressive.

×
×
  • Create New...