Jump to content

J Bennett

Members
  • Posts

    231
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by J Bennett

  1. "I don't agree with you. But the difference of opinion will probably remain academic. "  Field Marshall Von Runstedt  to Rommel  in the movie "The Desert Fox" starring James Mason as Rommel.  Anyway, I am breaking from my custom of only buying WW2 based CM games.  As a Ukrainian or Russian field commander might have said in recent years: "Gentlemen, in today's training we will simulate a hypothetical invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Army"  Well since this is now  real war I am going to purchase "CM Black Sea" because it is somehow more interesting now.

  2. 48 minutes ago, chuckdyke said:

    Quantity is a quality in its own right. Sherman 76 mm and T34/85 in the latter part of WW2. Single German Cat? attack it with a platoon. Against the AI it is easy, had three T34/85 against two Tiger1 in a recent game. Lost one T34 and the AI lost the two Tigers. Against a human player it would be different. 

    "Quantity is quality" I've always said that too. You are are so right. A lot of Shermans and T-34's got destroyed but in the end they prevailed. Like the elephant that got ate up by ants.  I like this thread. A lot of good stuff .

  3. On 7/7/2021 at 11:12 AM, Probus said:

    Why are you folks picking the Stuart over the Hellcat? @Erwin  @E5K

    A few years ago a couple of guys had an M18 Hellcat (they collected old military equipment) They restored it and and had a range to fire the cannon, One day they were firing the cannon and it blew up. and killed them both.  At least in a Stuart you might live if the gun blows up, well maybe not the guy loading but I will always take a Stuart over anything. It was the best tank ever.

  4. I purchased and downloaded the .rar file  but when winrar tries to open it, I get "file is in unknown format or damaged"  Is there something I did wrong. I have many CMx2  winrar files on my hard drive for the various games and they all open fine with winrar except this one.  it appears the downloaded file finished,  2,862,622 KB file.  Maybe data getting corrupted by bad packets.. not sure.

  5. 20 minutes ago, BletchleyGeek said:

    Not sure if there was a revision (since BFC doesn't produce comprehensive changelogs) but I have noticed that the shaders in CMFI now look better on my NVIDIA card (with the latest drivers). Lighting effects over surfaces are softer and more pleasing to the eye my eyes.

     I very recently "upgraded" from an ATI 7800 series card to a NVIDIA GTX 1060 . I used to have shaders turned off or on low and also the other settings at "better" or "improved" to get good  frame rates. Now I max everything .  It looks great. FPS varies greatly on "Huge" scenarios or maps from high teens to 50's and higher depending on where i put the camera. But for the most part its mid 30's. Thats a big step up for me.

  6. 3 hours ago, Pascucci said:

     

     

    I can't even play the new expansion if I wanted to. I'd have to purchase the V4 quality of life update. Most companies refer to performance and quality of life updates with minor gameplay modifications as patches. I paid $60 for the game when released, for some reason I expected performance updates to be covered in that price. Again I will restate that the forums being so slow is not a good sign, in general, of a healthy community. I used to see CM referred to all of the time elsewhere as well, I rarely here it mentioned now. Overall I wouldn't take the current situation as a good sign. I fully realize this will be taken as a crap opinion by many here, but I decided to give it anyways. I literally grew up on the CM v1 games, quite liked v2 early on as well and bought both Normandy and Italy soon after they came out, but I'm really disappointed in the current direction. 

      Few companies I have seen support their games as much as Battlefront does. They have done many free patches and V4 was pretty much a game overhaul and I have not seen any other companies do that . If you have please tell. They hardly need my defense but the BF team makes quality products with a small team of people. Seems pretty amazing to me what they have been able to do. Its written in a certain book that a worker is worthy of his wages .  There is only so much you can get for free, you've got to pay to play. As for the community being slow or unhealthy, that seems to be a subjective thing and a matter of opinion.  I;ve been here occasionally putting in my 2 cents or  passively reading it for years. I bet it will be here for more years.

  7.  Very interesting video. I remember from my non-illustrious military experience, we were issued the M-16A1 in my day. We were told immediately to never carry it by the carrying handle.  Thats the military for you. I dont know if it's true but my Drill Instructors told us the M-16 was based on a Mattel toy rifle. Maybe that's why it had the rather pointless carrying handle. I happen to be the proud owner of an M1 rifle I got through the CMP program. It seems to me it could have and maybe should have been used in the "ready" position, since it is semi-automatic with an 8 round clip. Also you can get really good at reloading it fast. When empty the clip ejects and you insert another one quickly as I 'm sure you all know.

  8. What if the troops were conscientious objectors?  Naturally then they would be hesitant to shoot at others. Another possibility is they had very low morale, actually they were thinking about surrendering. Now I ask you. If you want to surrender you probably dont want to shoot at the troops you might be surrendering to in a few minutes.

     Another possibility is these men are hungry. They are saving their ammo for edible game to shoot. Humans are not a clean animal to eat, also there was not much cannibalism in WW2.

    There are of course more reasons why men won't shoot at the enemy troops, but I suppose that would just be more speculating .

  9. Maybe off topic and I suppose for CM bigger is always better for screen size.

     But for me my monitor does double duty  I also use for Flight simulators: IL2 Sturmovik and DCS world so I would not want a bigger screen than about 32 inches.

     It seems to me anything bigger than that and I run the risk of my cockpit being BIGGER than a real life cockpit. Just thought I would throw that out. I know I just made

     everyone's day LOL.

×
×
  • Create New...