Jump to content

Bugged

Members
  • Posts

    528
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bugged

  1. ...

    and i dont think AVATAR got a too strong political message. i mean you can see it as a political message but only if "you" think yourself thats what the US is really doing.

    if you dont think that, its just a plot evolving around total exploitation of nature, not more not less. if you want to see something you will find it, sometimes more easy as in avatar or not so easy, but if you look hard enough you will find.

    That pretty much sums it up for me too.

    In the movie, there were a lot of characters involved in the mission to go to Pandora and the whole thing was arranged by a corporation, not the military. Still, there are some viewers who are focusing on Marines being painted in a bad light. I even heard today that there are some who are calling on all military personnel to boycott the movie. Pfft.

    Of course some of the main characters in the movie are ex-military, otherwise the invasion wouldn't be believable. Also, the 'hero' of a Hollywood blockbuster of this kind can't be a pencil-pusher - that's not very sexy. As you said, if you look hard enough, you'll find something.

    anyways i think the local military commander was a little overdone. the acting was fine and all that, sure he was told to "overact" it that way and it was deliberate, but well that was the most annoying thing for me in avatar. this character could have been so much better if he didnt acted like in a comic book film remake, and actually noone else did, only the marines commander was like this.

    I couldn't agree more. They really emphasized his character as the protagonist. Again, it's more appealing to do that rather than to make a faceless corporation the protagonist.

    For me, the movie stressed the importance of caring for our planet. Throughout the entire movie there was a huge focus on how the Na'vi treated their planet with respect. And, of course, the reason for humans being on their planet was that Earth was dying. It really has little to do with the military, in my opinion.

  2. At the end of January, I am going to southern Florida, ...

    You know, if you were anybody else I would warn against the possibilities of a break-in seeing as how you've been known to give out your address rather easily. But I think we all know that the joke would be on any would-be robber who dared enter your abode.

    I pity those in charge of emptying and cleaning your apartment in the unfortunate event that you DO die while on this upcoming trip.

  3. ... you need to place your bets now, ...

    If I recall correctly, before he was stabbed in the chest by an angry stingray, Steve Irwin went up against some sort of poisonous tree and lost the battle.

    It isn't a very glamourous injury, to be sure, but it seems fitting for a gnome to be injured by some form of flora. Maybe you'll trip on a vine, which will cause you to fall and sprain a joint (oh no, not the wrist!).

    The cheque is in the mail, Joe.

  4. Because your family is young, I would think you're more concerned with standard of living info - the quality of education, health care, and the like. Asking for input from this gang is fine if you're taking a vacation, but why ask for advice on where in the world you should move to, considering it's such a major undertaking? Make like Shania Twain and move to Switzerland.

  5. However the amount of processed food intake has increased greatly and I suspect that with dropping exercise rates, the rise of the computer and game consoles, then the effect has been much magnified.

    That's just it. Lustig talks about the 'perfect storm' that brought about the popularity of HFCS in processed foods ('it all started with Nixon'). The perfect storm is actually this:

    1.) We consume more calories than ever before. Lustig demonstrates this clearly with his Coca-Cola example - people don't think of a 20 oz bottle of Coke as 2.5 servings; most people will drink it in one go.

    2.) We get far less exercise than ever before. You've said this as well.

    3.) We eat less fibre than ever before. Processed foods are mainstream. They're loaded with salt, sugar and fat, but low in nutrients and fibre.

    That is the perfect storm that's led to the obesity problem. And knowing that HFCS has basically the exact same composition as table sugar - something that's been around forever - tells me it's not the type of sugar that's the culprit. It's that we're eating too much sugar, along with too many other empty calories, for what we burn off.

    Sure, Lustig has some charts to back up his theory, but he shows them at the exclusion of comparing diabetes rates to the decreased rates of exercise and fibre consumption over the past 30-odd years. Makes me question why.

×
×
  • Create New...