Jump to content

Arngrim

Members
  • Posts

    232
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by Arngrim

  1. Jersey, that would make me the fourth Euro Pbem.. no chance for a spot then :-(

    Ah well, I guess I support the European team more by not participating :cool:

    I'm getting my butt kicked by Kossuth right now, but he promised to give me valuable feedbach i.e. chew me out for my poor game tongue.gif

    I'll display my humiliation in an AAR later. :D

    [ April 20, 2004, 07:29 PM: Message edited by: Arngrim ]

  2. Well, How about this: TCP/IP starts at the same time as the Pbem games, which have to do a minimum of three turns a day (average) ande when the Pbem are drawing to a close, the TCP/IP players get a rematch with same bids, but reversed positions. The there will be a climactic end. Everyone happy? :)

  3. Hmmm, If you dismantle the HQ for MPOP's, is it lost forever as a combat result, or could you buy it back later?

    The finite number of HQ's is one of SC's shortcomings in my opinion btw. there should be (poor rated) generic HQ's for all countries. Air is strong enough as it is without the ability to forever cripple a major's offensive capability....

  4. Well, I think that the new system will be great, but I might continue to play SC1 because: I dislike 3d graphics hiding features or being distracting/confusing in startegic games. I like the graphics in PG, but that's as far as I go. This is mostly because the top-down view is superior in clarity. And since I feel that the squares are perfecty for chess, but obsolete in wargaming I have a very bad feeling about SC2.

    Finally, _we_ shouldn't make the system work, merely providing the developer with our honest feelings about it. I hate to see good games dissolve into poor secuels with good graphics but destroyed playability.

×
×
  • Create New...