Jump to content

Hueristic

Members
  • Posts

    499
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hueristic

  1. Originally posted by PooBah:

    Heuristic,

    I just don't even think about gamey tactics like that.

    Thanks to all

    LMAO

    While the iberian front is settled, the Italian fleet ruduces the port at gibralter to rubble and passes through to park itself off the atlantic coast of US. When the US enters, the Italian fleet is waiting for him, all MPP from italy is used for subs to put into atlantic via gibralter.

    What do you call this?

  2. Originally posted by JerseyJohn:

    a lousy player and not even a good cheater! smile.gif

    LMAO yes i can attest that you do not cheat that is very true i've seen some of your guys get some real bad luck on your turns.

    Speaking of our ongoing testing Where is my turn this mornin? I'm sitting here with coffee in hand and no enemy to plot against. I even answered Terifs call to battle. I'm not awake enough for that kind of beating.

  3. Originally posted by Heavy Junk:

    Any thoughts on Axis priorities in research?

    I like Jet/long/Ind and then anti-tank.

    Originally posted by Heavy Junk:

    I also saw referance to the Italian Gambit but havent seen anything that spells out what that strategy is.

    Lol post in the opponent finder forum and i'm sure someone will show it to you ;)

    Originally posted by Heavy Junk:

    I also got the impression it was considered a gamey ploy.

    There are many gamey ploys some get more annoyed by this one because it cannot be initially countered.
  4. Originally posted by KDG:

    but the way it is now, there is no way to sneak up on a city

    You are loseing site of the scale of the game. There is no way to sneak up a army through an enemy country period. You can send one to harry behind the lines but it will become unsupplied and do nothing more than become unsupplied and cost the enemy some operational costs to counter.

    Don't lose track of the size of the theatre. This is not a tactical scale.

  5. SC.EXE: dumping core to generate debugging information...

    SC.EXE: PANIC CASCADE: unexpected harmful signal -- Giving up...

    What's up with this? Got it on during first turn watching axis move. Entire system went unstable and had to reboot. This system is normally Super Stable. Music Match jukebox and nothing else besides systray in memory on win98 lite.

    [ February 19, 2003, 09:35 AM: Message edited by: Hueristic ]

  6. Originally posted by Minotaur:

    all French units located within

    territories controlled by the United Kingdom, or any Allied Minor country will

    automatically become a Free French Unit under United Kingdom's control.

    This is incorrrect as it is only territories that The allies start with. One's that are aquired dureing gameplay do not count.
  7. Originally posted by Twiddle:

    I do not have the information, intelligence nor education to second guess the government on these issues. I am not in favor of war nor increasing the inspectors.

    Lol you think that is what makes Bushs policy? The only thing making his policy is his Ego/Views/Desires. Saddam has been makeing him look like an idiot and he can't deal with it. I'd love to just put the both of them in a room and Beat the **** out of whichever one of them walks out.

    :D

  8. I was a "Master of disaster" When i was in and we had a saying that was.

    "Napalm Burns little kids too" And that's the fact jack. I'd hate to see a bunch on children killed because Our president is a POS that needs to fix his Daddy's mistake.

    What we need to do is Bomb every Palace Bunker Complex at the exact same instant into dust. I'm sure we'd get that Scumbag without all the collateral damage. He needs to be removed there is no doubt but bush is doing it the wrong way. And the worst thing about it is Bush continually lie's to us about the reasons like we're a bunch of morons that can't see through his Bull****.

    What's more is Anytime We enter a country we should ANNEX it as a STATE. Eventually we will have on world Government. I'ts gonna happen eventually there's nothing we can do to stop it so it might as well be our form of gov if we gotta do all the fighting. Rebuilding a country then giving it to some bull**** faction or warlord or setting up a gov that's gonna get toppled by the military is the worst thing we can do to the iraqi people. But i seriously doubt Bush's administration cares about the innocents that are gonna die. That is what he in Saddam both have in common. Bush is gonna be the first President Voted out of office During a war. Watch He''l make sure we are still in a War for Re-election time. And don't forget your Duct Tape.

  9. Originally posted by JerseyJohn:

    At a strategy conference where Hitler sought grand assessments of Italy's potential, von Rundstedt gave the following appraisal: "If they remain neutral we'll need a mountain division to watch the Alps. If they join the British we will need two mountain divisions to guard the passes. If they join us perhaps twelve divisions to defend Italy."

    LMAO :D never heard this one!
  10. Originally posted by jon_j_rambo:

    Who will be the first to beat Terif? Hope it's me. Most likely will be Zapp, because they play 3-games a day.

    LMAO.

    Lol u never cease to make me break out in a laugh ;)

    I'm not sure if anyone will get him. The one game i thought i had him was my second time ever playing axis i was kicking butt but snuck a finish unit behind his lines to harry and activated siberian army! Damn i didn't know a size 4 unsupplied corp would send the entire Mother russia Eastern Defence to the rescue! Got a little depressed at that. Part of my game is probing for weaknesses and exploiting them. Not haveing to cover inner russia i think is a major flaw.

  11. Originally posted by DalmatiaPartisan:

    I ll be short and direct

    this ladder system requires improvements.

    That has never been in refute since it's inception. the issue is the time involved in setting one up and running it. No-one seems to be willing to make that commitment. Zap spends a considerable amount of time maintaining that thread and I for one wouldn't do it.

    If someone were to setup a "site ladder" then i'm sure we would all use it and ZAP would appreciate the break.

    IF your willing to do it then i recommend Useing the link HUBERT posted in the Ladder Thread. Also anyone that goes to these length's should send an email off to hubert to safegaurd the admin signone for the ladder in case after setup they lose interest in the game. Then the reins could be passed to the next "Exuberant" one. ;)

×
×
  • Create New...