Jump to content

Brent Pollock

Members
  • Posts

    953
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Brent Pollock

  1. No. As mentioned back on page 2 of this thread, it's a question of button vs zipper fly :rolleyes:

    Originally posted by Tagwyn:

    So ... all Red Army troop peed in their pants? I thought all Euros peed in thier pants? Perhaps Grogs too? Tag

  2. ...and the fly grog I've been awaiting since page 2 finally arrives :D

    Originally posted by Michael Dorosh:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Moon:

    Yes, we'll be mirroring this later today as well. It's a fun (not meant to be taken serious) promo video for the upcoming Games Convention in Germany later this month.

    Martin

    Since when did Russian uniforms in the 1940s have zipper flys?

    tsk tsk redface.gif </font>

  3. If you had your e-mail in your profile, I'd have already sent you a game file instead of posting here.

    If you want to play, send something to me (my e-mail should be in the profile: b3b@telusplanet.net).

    I've only played these rules solo and am also curious to see how it goes in a 2 player game; I suggest we start with something small...not to heavily forested, as the trees are the hardest things to see past. Plenty of hills and buildings should be good. I'll play any nationality, date or weather.

    Originally posted by 86smopuim:

    are u asking for the rules?

    these are them I think...

    (and if u are interested inplaying CMBB that way versus some one, send tme an email. I want to play iot this way but cant find an opponent who will do it)...

  4. Oh gawd - no! My wrist still aches thinking of the demo...and then there were those gawdawful English language voicings, like "Hees arrrmore eees too theeck!"

    Weeks later I found the CMBO demo and haven't looked back since.

    Originally posted by shredder:

    Or maybe you never stopped playing it...

    [ August 01, 2006, 12:01 PM: Message edited by: Brent Pollock ]

  5. The graphics aren't the concern here, rather it's the extra "rules" usually required to account for all the stumbling about, getting disoriented, illumination rounds/fires & friendly fire that is more prevalent in the black of night.

    Originally posted by TuuSaR:

    I'm quite tempted to hit gamma settings high if visibility is too dark. So dusk is enough for me.

  6. Beats me. Maybe just a picture that would allow the aircrews to justify not being able to interdict anything moving under that canopy. Or maybe the gaps are from bomb/shell impacts?

    Originally posted by Sivodsi:

    I'm trying to figure out what 386 is, other than a historical arborists wet dream: "Ah yes, the 1944 oak, autumn I believe, a fine crop of acorns fell from those trees, not quite as fertile as the previous '43 crop, but still some fine saplings were produced of that generation..."

  7. There is one city battle that we would work with the first release, if it had Italian forces - Germans vs Italians in Rome. I recall one ASL scenario that forbade either side from entering buildings because orders had been isued to limit impact on civilians/architecture or somesuch. Hmmm...maybe only the Germans were restricted by this special rule...memory fading...

    Which brings, me to my next question: when we get the Italian add-on, will they be able to fight the Germans, especially in Sept 43?

  8. From the ToW page:

    Over 30 different maps designed using historical military documents and covering a variety of

    seasons, weather conditions and environments...

    Will night be included in the initial release, or will we have to wait for an upgrade?

    [a quick search suggested that no one else had posed this question]

  9. [squint...squint harder] Hmmm...I think you are quite correct. I originally eyeballed it quickly and mistook the darkened blast area for a dug pit...and the whells looked so perfectly placed, too...sigh...

    Originally posted by RMC:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Brent Pollock:

    That is good news, considering that one of the screenshots seems to show an 88 mm PaK with its wheels off so it was easier to dig-in.

    LOL. To me it looks like it got pounded til the wheels fell off. </font>
  10. Hey...yeah...

    TANK = ROLLING BUNKER

    &

    BUNKER = SPECIALISED HOUSE (usually with just a single storey/door/room/"window")

    ...so...treat a house like a big, non-moving tank with a large crew.

    Works for me.

    The next level will be loopholing & mouseholing, but those can wait for the urban combat upgrade :)

  11. Hmmm...so on the attack, I'm not going to have to worry about dropping the church steeple, because no one'll be in it. That's going to save me some ammo.

    Assaulting without HE fire support should be easier, too, because I won't have to sweat assaulting that big stone farmhouse that dominates that Italian vineyard because it's too damned muddy for my tanks to come up and the FO can't get the 25 pdrs on it due to the atrocius maps he has to use.

    I'm going to love TOW when it comes out, but I'll even take it home for dinner with my folks & keep a picture of it in my wallet once it also has buildings you can use.

×
×
  • Create New...