I'm sorry Pak40 but Ambrose' obsessive focus on the "small picture" and his lack of footnotes or even endnotes disqualify him from, IMO, being considered as a serious historian, no matter his credentials.
His plagerism was probably due to (ironically) his popularity and the pressure to publish more product. He is fast becoming the Stephen King of WWII literature.
Keegan is running a close second here I believe. I did enjoy his "Six Armies in Normandy" as a bit of light reading - his presentation was interesting - but it is not comparable to say, Carlo De'Este's "Decision in Normandy" as a detailed or scholarly work.
The book "Closing w/ the Enemy..." is excellent as is "Eisenhower's Leutenants(sp?)" - you can read my review of the latter book on Amazon.com - it's the second one under the name A Reader from FL (I don't know where my name got to - I am registered ).
PS; Ignore the 3rd review - the guys a hack.
Regards,
Barkhorn.
[ March 07, 2002, 01:33 PM: Message edited by: Barkhorn1x ]