MyNameW

<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by not another gamer: About effective armor slope in hulldown / reverse slope I can't quote BTS saying so but I think I remember reading it long ago and it really seems to get me in my games. The velocity and hence trajectory of shell is taken into account when calculating angle of hit. So, those low-velocity (relativly) Shermans get "plunging fire" on my shiny Hetzers and JgIV's (greatly) reducing their effective armor slope. Nailing them when they are all snug and HD on a reverse slope. Makes me very sad.<hr></blockquote> AP shell's H-velocity is 600+, V-velocity is ~10. "plunging angle" is about 1 degree resulting in effective armor thikness is reduced about 1-2%.

<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by not another gamer: About effective armor slope in hulldown / reverse slope I can't quote BTS saying so but I think I remember reading it long ago and it really seems to get me in my games. The velocity and hence trajectory of shell is taken into account when calculating angle of hit. So, those low-velocity (relativly) Shermans get "plunging fire" on my shiny Hetzers and JgIV's (greatly) reducing their effective armor slope. Nailing them when they are all snug and HD on a reverse slope. Makes me very sad.<hr></blockquote> AP shell's H-velocity is 600+, V-velocity is ~10. "plunging angle" is about 1 degree resulting in effective armor thikness is reduced about 1-2%.

Kabul, Avganistan :mad:

<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by The Commissar: I don't see why someone decided to say this was a Nazi site. Disclaimer taken from site home page (click the house icon to get to home page). "Предупреждение! Данный сайт посвящен истории Второй Мировой Войны и не пропагандирует идеи нацизма." Which translates to... "Warning! This site is dedicated to the history of the Second World War and does not preach the ideas of fascism."<hr></blockquote> I am ballerina!!! Anyone believes this?

<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Wreck: Correction: looks like the cover figures are 11% and 19%. So, the guys in the wood should expect to take 72% higher casualties initially, not 50%.<hr></blockquote> Probability of taking casualties cannot depend linearly on firepower & cover. Also small arms are extreamly effective at very short ranges. So that 72% difference in cover figures may result in 200-300% or even more difference in casualty rate.

Smells like the web site authors have little knoledge of USSR history.

Another quasi-nazi site. http://angriff.narod.ru/fotopage/fotocol190.jpg Caption to the above picture proves my statement. Caption to this http://angriff.narod.ru/fotopage/fotocol.043.jpg picture says that "bolshevik" had thrown grenade at that guys tank. Why bolshevik??? Maybe he was my grandfather? He never been a bolshevik. He did not like bolshevik. He hated bolsheviks. But he had thrown grenades at nazi because he had VERY GOOD REASON TO DO THAT!

Another quasi-nazi site. http://angriff.narod.ru/fotopage/fotocol190.jpg Caption to the above picture proves my statement. Caption to this http://angriff.narod.ru/fotopage/fotocol.043.jpg picture says that "bolshevik" had thrown grenade at that guys tank. Why bolshevik??? Maybe he was my grandfather? He never been a bolshevik. He did not like bolshevik. He hated bolsheviks. But he had thrown grenades at nazi because he had VERY GOOD

<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by redwolf: That is useless since the checksum would be computed by the computer of the cheater, whence the checksumming routine is as vulnerable to manipulation as the executable itself.<hr></blockquote> 1)Not realy, IMHO games like Starcraft and Diablo are not hacked yet. You cannot paly on Battlenet with cracked exe. 2) Also encrypting movis using both password is good idea. So that person whos PC computes the movie cannot see it.

<blockquote>quote:</font><hr> hope this time it will work <hr></blockquote> http://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gif http://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gif http://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gif http://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gif http://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gif http://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gif http://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gif http://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gif http://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gif http://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gif

http://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gifhttp://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gifhttp://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gifhttp://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin .gifhttp://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gifhttp://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gifhttp://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gifhttp://www.battlefront.com/discuss/big'>http://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gifhttp://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gifhttp://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gifhttp://www.battlefront.com/discuss/big grin.gifhttp://www.battlefront.com/discuss/biggrin.gif

Don't worry guys. I am just learning. <blockquote>quote:</font><hr> <hr></blockquote> <blockquote>quote:</font><hr> <hr></blockquote> [*]new list :cool:

<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by MyNameW: :confused: :confused: <hr></blockquote> 1121212121212

:confused: :confused:

:cool: :eek: :mad: