Panzer76
-
Posts
1,100 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Panzer76
-
-
That means that it cost me personally the bulk of my life savings and my earnings over the last few years.
Now, thats dedication and passion! Thanks for dedication both to you and the team. Im sorry to see yourself having not much to show for your personal time and money spent on this. I hope there exist some karma in the world, and your efforts will be rewarded in some other way.
Good luck with your future, and thanks again!
-
Ok.. the controls are HOPELESS. This is one of the games I really want to like and play, but how can I when the controls are counter intuitive (to other RTS') and are all over the keyboard. I mean, cmon, the technical quality is nice, bit the controls are from the 90this. Please look into this as the controls of any game are fundamental to the enjoyment of said game. And please dont give me any crap about how we will get used to it. We already are used to how most games handles movement and control, why would this game need any special keys for that? (hint, it doesnt and it is just stupid)
-
Hehe, havent posted here in a LONG time. Anyways, if you do a search you will find PLENTY of (heated) discussions about this.
But it can basically be explained by this:
Due to modelling restriction, the Stug's front is modelled as the whole front is resistant to the 76mm, while in reality, only parts were. Expect this to change we the eastern front is visited again in cmx2.
-
Good AI? No. Atleast not in 1.03, I uninstalled the game after that. Perhaps its better now, but I doubt it is significantly better.
-
Yay for these statements. However, Im puzzled as to why you keep harping on about "the bad guys" that does not like your design decisions.Originally posted by Battlefront.com:Introduce a new Quick Battle system
Some additional MultiPlayer options
Some changes to the UI
-
Id like just to voice my opinion that Id favour different vehicles over multiple instances of the same vehicle. I play the games to fight, not look at the doodaads.
-
Serbia is suffering from a national vitcimization syndrome, and has so for hundreds of years. Poor, poor Serbia.
-
Doing so would spell the end of the US world dominance for sure and as a bonus, would not accomplish the the probable mission goals.
-
Is this really true? I know that some systems are under development, but the history of anti-missle systems does not provide great confidence in the effectiveness of future systems. </font>Originally posted by Hat Trick:</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by cool breeze:
Tanks will soon regularly sport anti missiles systems that beat almost all missiles.
-
Regarding RPG effect on Humvees:
Here is one that just keeps on rolling after being hit:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2b4_1180908686
While I dont think these will be moving anywhere soon:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8f4_1177581052
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8f4_1177581052
I guess its dependant on what kind of warhead you use and where you hit.
While the first Humvee kept on rolling, I think some of the occupants can very easily have been injured or killed.
-
That was strange. Anyways, thats an older version of the vehicle. I used to be a driver for the newer one, the BV206.
They were really good winter terrain and off road vehicles. But I wouldnt want to be in one in a combat zone as they have no armour at all.
Armamanet usually consisted of one .50 cal mounted on the roof.
-
Some of us just want to play a *game* that gives us interesting challanges and the oppertunity for *balanced* battles vs other players.
-
-
Just to clarify, does this mean that the 1st WWII game using the CMx2 engine will NOT be Westeren Front? In which case I would rejoice!Originally posted by Battlefront.com:But I can say for sure we are going back to the Eastern Front as soon as we can.
-
Is it too early to complain about the 1.07 patch? I hope not.
-
1st. Skelly, they didnt negotiate with Taliban, they negotiated with the Eldars for the village, trusting them to defend it. For whatever reason, they didnt. You know, we cant occupy every village in Afghanistan and someday they will have to fend for themselfs.
2nd. This battle wont mean squat in the larger picture. We dont win there with military force alone. And thats something the west still havent taken seriously. I wonder how many lives will be lost before (if) we wake up.
3rd. Sadly Afghan is a sideshow ever since US invaded Iraq and everybody involved is worse off because of it.
4th. Some of you may not know it, but skelly is a right wing nut case, or atleast used to be some years ago. White power etc. Dunno if he has changed his ways.
-
I would say yes. Not a big deal for single player mode, but a game breaker for MP.
-
In CMx1 you have a strat AI and a tact AI.
In CMSF you have worse strat AI, but they are supposed to use the scenario makers guides of approach etc. The TacAI in CMSF is worse than CMx1.
In the end, as a sinlge player experience, CMx1 will probably give you much more mileage, and if you are ever going to play MP, there is no contest, CMx1 is way better.
But, the core issue here if you LIKE the game. Try both games, and decide. Just be aware that CMx1 have endless possibilities, CMSF is very constricted.
-
Except ofcos, all these games got great scores in reviews, and CMSF Metascore is just over 60. Its not like there is only a few "rotten apples" who think this game is lacking, but rather, most people.Originally posted by DaveDash:This thread reminds me exactly of all the Shogan Total War vets grumbling about Rome Total War when it was released, or Civ2 vets grumbling about Civ3, or game X fans grumbling about the new game Y.
-
CMBB hands down.
-
Oh Im sorry, its just that Im used with the activity level of the CMx1 forums... but this is great! </font>Originally posted by MarkEzra:</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Panzer76:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by MarkEzra:
This forum not dead like you keep saying...most of us just waiting...You are clearly in need of glasses.
-
Oh Im sorry, its just that Im used with the activity level of the CMx1 forums... but this is great!Originally posted by MarkEzra:This forum not dead like you keep saying...most of us just waiting...You are clearly in need of glasses.
-
Relax Sixx, had it not been for the complaining you would have nothing to read on this forum.Originally posted by Sixxkiller:We know some of you arent happy, you say it in every thread.
-
Huh? Nothing Ive seen would indicate this. The reviews are bland, and the forums are "dead". Not exactly what I would expect if this game was played and enjoyed by so many as you seem to indicate.Originally posted by MarkEzra:There is another view, not clouded by vitriol or supposed slights and insults, that is actually the majority view: I play the game, I like the game
Thanks to all!
in Combat Mission Shock Force 1
Posted
While Ive been less than thrilled by the direction BTS choose with the SF games, Im always happy to see them do well. I look forward to the Normandy game and hope I will find my way back here after being dissapointed by SF.