Jump to content

MSBoxer

Members
  • Posts

    301
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by MSBoxer

  1. Regarding US politics.

    Let's all just remember that what a politician says is not always what they do.

    "Read my lips no new taxes"

    "If you like your doctor, you can keep them"

    This is particularly true during election season.

    I am not posting this to start a debate/pissing match over which party said/says/lies most.  Just pointing out some examples from somewhat recent history.

  2. 24 minutes ago, Battlefront.com said:

    If the driver was unaware then it is likely the bomb was remote detonated by someone pushing a button and not by GPS.  That someone was probably watching from a drone.  The winds weren't that bad and a small quadcopter would not likely tripped any air defense alarms (and even if it did, it wouldn't likely matter).  A chase car is possible, but it would be very risky as the driver could have been killed, injured, or captured.

    This has been my thought; except I would have the "chase car" follow the truck onto the bridge and then pass the truck.  Get 100 yards ahead and then once I spotted the train, wait for the truck to get into position then detonate.

    The trigger man could then proceed into Crimea un-scathed and continue home or to next mission.

    Judging by the spray and waves I would not risk using a drone.

  3. 33 minutes ago, Beleg85 said:

    Damn...

     

    This video looks off.  Typically track is not ballested on bridges. It is embedded directly in concrete as seen on this previous picture of the bridge https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.unian.info/society/amp-10586211-russian-occupation-forces-build-first-rail-track-on-kerch-strait-bridge-photo.html

     

    Of course this may have been done as a temporary fix, but I still have my doubts that this is from the bridge.

     

     

     

  4. 18 minutes ago, FancyCat said:

     

     

     

    If this is true, it gives me hope.  For all of those that say that Russian culture is irredeemable, I ask 

    If Ukraine was such a substantial part of Russia/Soviet Union just over 30 years ago, I have hopes that if there is actually a change at the top in Russia we could see a change in the overall regard for humanity across the board.

    This may be a simplistic view, and I have no idea if the average Ukrainian from 30+ years ago had the same views as today's Russians, but it gives me hope and there are times when hope in your fellow man is all you can ask for.

  5. 1 hour ago, acrashb said:

    Wonderful to hear, too many Americans take Canada for granted.  And conversely, many Canadians are foolishly afraid of our American cousins; some of my acquaintances worry that the US could get bored and invade Toronto, to which I reply "what are you on, crack?  The poutine is in Montreal!"

    My friends from the Great White North, like to refer to the U.S. as "Canada's Basement"  where they hide their simple minded cousins when polite company comes to visit.

    In turn I tell them that Canada is actually our 51st state and is officially known as "Northern North Dakota"

  6. 3 hours ago, Bulletpoint said:

    No, but when a German hears words like "war", "army", "gun", etc. he gets very different mental images than an American does.

    34 years ago when we were stationed in West Berlin, this was much less true.  Of course the local population lived in a city surrounded by Soviet forces who presented a pretty convincing threat.

  7. Unfortunately our European partners have allowed their militaries to atrophy for 3 decades, confident that the US would support them in any conflict.  I believe that the war in Ukraine has been a rude awakening, forcing them to realize that there continues to be a need for a strong defense against aggressors, strong enough not only defend their own territory, but to contribute to defense of allied nation states.

    Now I know that Ukraine is not a member of NATO, but if European nations had built the means to defend not only themselves but also contribute to the defense of their neighbors, there would be more than enough equipment to spare for Ukraine.

    Every nation gets to make their own decisions on what to send, but in some cases these choices are limited by available stock as well as political considerations.

     

  8. 26 minutes ago, Taranis said:

    And you forgot the error message giving a crash when playing Russians 😂

    CM Black Sea selection screen
    Player selects Russia
     - You selected Russia - Are you sure??? (Y/N)
     - You selected Russia again - Are you really sure???????! (Y/N)
     - You selected Russia - You Lose
     - Would you like to play again?  (Y/N)

  9. 8 minutes ago, chrisl said:

    But once I have the first two, do I really need something big, slow, expensive, and easy to destroy to bring in the HE on stubborn fixed targets?

    Launching a drone and flying it to a target takes much longer than a 120mm round.  Event calling in artillery takes longer.  Now I know that the MBT or large gun vehicle may take a few minutes to get in position, but once on target it can fire multiple rounds much faster than either artillery or drone while correcting  as needed.   Also upper level support may be occupied by other fire missions. Not to mention the fact that drones and missiles can be intercepted or guidance degraded.  Try that with a rifled round.

    Plus, in most cases 120mm don't care about openings, they make their own.

  10. So are we talking about an armored formation similar to a carrier task force with 

    • Infantry =  subs / scouting and removing threats with precision ordance
    • drone hosts = destroyers / identifying threats and protecting larger assets 
    • gun platform = cruiser / mid range threat reduction
    • MBT = carrier / long range threat reduction & support of other units

    I may have the sequencing off or we could add/combine capabilities

    Edit: I also forgot to add an air/drone defense unit/ could be in the destroyer class.

  11. From a Facebook post - for what it is worth

     

    And this is how they did it! 😉
    The most exciting news these few days, involves the question of how the Ukrainians managed to employ American supplied AGM-88 High-speed Anti Radiation Missile (HARM) against Russian radar equipment when they don't have any Western aircraft capable of using the Air-Launched HARM which requires special avionics to be integrated into the aircraft using it.
     
    It has now been revealed that the Ukrainian Air Force managed to integrate the AGM-88 HARM onto their Mikoyan-Gurevich Mig-29 Fulcrum's with the help of technicians from Raytheon. Raytheon is the American company that manufactures the AGM-88 HARM.
     
    But, the deeper question of HOW the American technicians managed to put it off? To integrate Western weaponry into a 1980's vintage Soviet era design is no walk in the park. The answer? The Americans had prior experience with the Mig-29 Fulcrum and deep technical knowledge of the aircraft that helped them to develop a way to integrate the AGM-88 HARM onto it within a short time and with apparently little effort.
    Back in 1997, the Americans acquired 21 units of Mig-29 Fulcrum-A, the newer Fulcrum-C and a single twin-seater Fulcrum-B conversion trainer, seen here being loaded into a USAF Boeing C-17 Globemaster III, from Moldova.

    The acquired aircraft were literally studied to the last bolt by the USAF's National Air and Space Intelligence Centre (NASIC) formerly and perhaps better known as the Foreign Technology Division (FTD).
    These early model Mig-29 Fulcrum-A and Fulcrum-C are similar, if not identical, to the models that the Ukrainian Air Force is flying today. Hence, any information that the Americans gained from the Moldovian units 25 years ago is still relevant and useful. It is this technical knowledge gained from the exploitation of enemy equipment that gives the Americans their edge.
×
×
  • Create New...