Jump to content

ferdinand

Members
  • Posts

    43
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by ferdinand

  1. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by CombinedArms:

    It's not the hit effects that reflect fuzzy logic, but the response to the hit effects.

    [ 06-07-2001: Message edited by: CombinedArms ]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Now I'm lost. I thought fuzzy logic was 'just' a generalization of 'vanilla' logic with Boolean operators, i.e. the algorithm is still completely deterministic : if you feed it the same situation, it should produce the same decision.

    Unless what you're meaning is that small differences in the input ("almost the same" situation) can result in big differences in the output.

  2. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Robert Olesen:

    The "bell shaped curve" is a normal density function. The mathematical formula for this one may be a bit hard to get hold of in some cases, though it is available in e.g. spreadsheets.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    You don't need the density function to generate a random variate, so it's easy to implement in any language that can generate an uniform variate.

  3. I tried to do a search but I can't get it to work.

    Does anyone know which factors affect the display of confirmed kills ? I assume it depends on distance, cover, experience and some random factor, maybe.

    Can you confirm a kill by walking your troops to the spot of the carnage ? Also, do observers ever get some kills confirmed ?

    Of course, I'm mostly interested in the opposite: can you deny your opponent the knowledge of the losses he inflicted ?

  4. Re : My Infantry Squad Won't Fire It's Faust On An Approaching Wasp

    Dear Colonel Deadmarsh,

    Don't give up, recall all the wonderful moments you spent with your squads.

    Sure these infantry squads can get frustrating at times, but did your try to see things from their point of view ? Try to take some time to listen to their real needs and feelings, this will lead to a deeper understanding of each other.

    The main thing is to clarify issues that are causing pain, maybe you had some unrealistic expectations about these squads ?

    PS : don't mind me, i just felt a bit silly today

  5. I agree with everything you (PawBroon) said but ...

    <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by PawBroon:

    There is nothing like a Robin Hood mentality where protecting BTS is good while ripping Microsoft is only natural.

    [ 05-11-2001: Message edited by: PawBroon ]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Microsoft's consumer dedication is not exactly the same at BTS's (have you read the Microsoft manifesto ?), besides they have enough lawyers to take care of themselves.

  6. Trying to defend with a full infantry force in flat farmland against a full armour (German) AI is quite entertaining too. Of course you let the computer pick both forces. With a bit of luck (at 500 points), you'll only have mines as AT weapons, and then each turn becomes a Hitchcockian scene, with you wondering whether the computer will run his front-leading tanks over your mines, swearing when he avoids them. Fun, in a masochistic way.

  7. I thought the main board was only for cold-blodeed, poker-faced, tight-lipped true gognards who could show Clint Eastwood a thing or two about counter pushing...

    Or are you guys now allowed to start about any old thread just by putting the Peng brand into the title ?

    Speaking of which I fully share MrPeng's opinion about smileys, only they were called emoticons last time I checked.

×
×
  • Create New...