I am surprised no has spoken up about the excessive toughness of the jumbo.
Further more quite the reverse for the Panther, Hezter, and the Jagdepanzer IV,
Who's armor seems to be there in names sake only.
Jumbo: Historical stats as I know them are:
7" gun shield (152mm)
CM has it at 178mm
6" side and rear turret (132mm)
Cm has it at 152mm
5.5" lower front hull (121mm)
CM has it at 131mm
4" upper hull (88mm)
CM has it at 102mm
CM appears to be toughening up this Tank.
Could someone help me understand, why there is a difference?
In regard to the Panther and others, I have been following the discussion about the bad mix of steel alloy do to shortages. Now this may well be true, according to a British study done in 44, but if you were to take into account ALL the studies done on the armored protection of the Panther, by other British, American, and the Germans, the big picture becomes clear. The picture seems to be, that the Panther was one hell of a tank to knock out, from the front. Now using this 85% armor modifier creates whole new scene. The Cat becomes more of a pussy, then a beast.
It seems to me that the one study done by the Brits in 44 may have been narrow in scope, for with it the Panther behaves uncharacteristic. Dismiss it, as flawed and the pieces fall back into place.
------------------