Jump to content

LuckyStrike

Members
  • Posts

    163
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by LuckyStrike

  1. Originally posted by KiwiJoe:

    Then my 155mm guns open up and slaughter a whole platoon in 1 turn...

    Absolutely agreed. I only buy the big stuff now and find I win far more games that way. For some reason opponents are always surprised when 155 starts to land, but for the cost of an infantry platoon for 1 FO the damage potential from 25-30 rounds of this stuff is simply enormous - and its also effective versus armor.

  2. Lewis,

    In order to kill men standing (or lying or whatever) on the ground, a shell fired at them must impact a POINT ON THE GROUND, so that the shell may explode. Therefore, one aims the shell AT THIS GROUND POINT TARGET, not at the men. Of course one's GOAL is to kill the men, but one must LAND the shell somewhere to do that.

    How much more simple can it get? If you do not agree with the above, please tell us what exactly DO you aim a shell at aside from the ground (in the case of men in, say, an open field) so that it might be caused to explode? How do you suppose HE shells function?

    [This message has been edited by LuckyStrike (edited 01-26-2001).]

  3. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Big Time Software:

    Just a few things I want to clarify.

    2. We do not use a "to-hit probability table" in any way, shape or form. The core basis of our to-hit equations is a Gaussian function. It has a "bell" shape very similar to the accuracy curves that people have posted in this thread.

    Charles

    <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I assume when you say you are using a Gaussian bell shape you are just taking the right half of the bell, such that the maximum hit probability, which would be the mean (highest point) of the bell, occurs at the minimum range.

    [This message has been edited by LuckyStrike (edited 01-22-2001).]

×
×
  • Create New...