Lars
Members-
Posts
6,214 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Lars
-
Comparitive Airpower 1939
Lars replied to William of Orange's topic in Strategic Command 2 Blitzkrieg and Weapons and Warfare
You might want to check your aircraft ranges (and history) again. The airfields in the south of England were being hit. Because that was the only place where the Germans could escort their now highly vulnerable bombers. Everywhere else, the RAF was safe. Supplies, training, etc., could be, and were, done on the west coast, out of reach of the Luftwaffe. The importance of the Battle of Britain was the RAF made sure the Royal Navy was never put to the test. -
Comparitive Airpower 1939
Lars replied to William of Orange's topic in Strategic Command 2 Blitzkrieg and Weapons and Warfare
The Luftwaffe never could have destroyed the RAF. The RAF always had the option of retreat. Doesn't matter who the commander was. The Luftwaffe never had the proper tools. Like a long range fighter. Wasn't their fault really. Hitler told them they'd never have to fight the British, so they never built what would have been needed. -
TCP/IP Game AAR
Lars replied to pzgndr's topic in Strategic Command 2 Blitzkrieg and Weapons and Warfare
How's the Battle of the Atlantic going? -
Comparitive Airpower 1939
Lars replied to William of Orange's topic in Strategic Command 2 Blitzkrieg and Weapons and Warfare
The Hurricane had one massive advantage over the Me109. A VHF radio. See above about the radar and ponder the importance of a ground controller. -
Comparitive Airpower 1939
Lars replied to William of Orange's topic in Strategic Command 2 Blitzkrieg and Weapons and Warfare
Was obsolete at war's start. They went with it just because it was what they had. -
Comparitive Airpower 1939
Lars replied to William of Orange's topic in Strategic Command 2 Blitzkrieg and Weapons and Warfare
You have to realize that in the 20's and 30's, strategic bombing was bombing the enemy's population base to break his will. And any idiot can hit a city. After you had wiped out his air force on the ground to prevent the riposte, of course. No fighter aircraft required, just bombers. Was only after the invention of an effective bombsight in the late 30's that you could go for what we today call strategic bombing, attacking the means of your enemy to resist, his factories, ports, etc. And the Germans never really had a good bombsight. So they went with dive bombers and low level light bombers to ensure a hit. Pretty much a pure tactical force, but the capability to hit a city was still there. And the kicker was the Brits invented radar, which really changed the rules of the game entirely. Pretty much threw poor Douhet's theory out the window, because now a defense was possible, as you knew when the bombers were coming and could do something about it. Like building fighters. -
Comparitive Airpower 1939
Lars replied to William of Orange's topic in Strategic Command 2 Blitzkrieg and Weapons and Warfare
I suggest you look at a map of Europe, draw a 2500 mile circle based on London, and tell me Great Britain didn't have a strategic bomber. Hell, they had one in WWI. A Vickers Vimy carried the same bomb load as a B-17. All you really needed to do was replace the HE with gas. -
Minors dont fully Surrender
Lars replied to Mr.Dozer's topic in Strategic Command 2 Blitzkrieg and Weapons and Warfare
Pretty typical for all areas the Germans invaded. The Commies weren't exactly loved. -
Bad times for...spys
Lars replied to Codename Condor's topic in Strategic Command 2 Blitzkrieg and Weapons and Warfare
Apparently, there's been a drop in the price of crack. -
Interesting article by UK officer on US Army
Lars replied to Wisbech_lad's topic in Combat Mission Shock Force 1
Thanks for the link, Wisbech. Cuz this is how it was reported in (admittedly) the Guardian. My first reaction was, "Well, he should know, now shouldn't he?".