AR

Stockholm, Sweden.

No Ben, you are wrong. It is because I'm so special.

Check that sh*t out!!! I was not aware of my status. Cewl!!! BTW - is that good or bad?

bad post! [ 04-12-2001: Message edited by: AR ] [ 04-12-2001: Message edited by: AR ]

Please ignore! [ 04-12-2001: Message edited by: AR ]

27 It seems like the average CM-player is getting younger since the last poll. Hmmm?! Now, back to lurking. ------------------ It gets better each time as long as it's never with the same woman. Al Bundy

The rest of the world could be wrong, but isn't George W an idiot. I guess the rest of the world is wrong once again... Yup, I need a flame to keep me warm up here in the north. ------------------ It gets better each time as long as it's never with the same woman. Al Bundy

The rest of the world could be wrong, but isn't George W an idiot. I guess the rest of the world is wrong once again... Yup, I need a flame to keep me warm up here in the north. ------------------ It gets better each time as long as it's never with the same woman. Al Bundy

I never thought I would say this, but do a search. It's been discussed several times before. ------------------ It gets better each time as long as it's never with the same woman. Al Bundy

Kingfish - that is humour! ------------------ It gets better each time as long as it's never with the same woman. Al Bundy

I'm just curious, is the CM Borg somehow related to the great Björn Borg? Imagine Borg and Borg playing doubles. ------------------ It gets better each time as long as it's never with the same woman. Al Bundy

Yes, I've tried that, but it is rather sad to always play rural and flat maps. Still, you have to run from cover to cover with your inf platoons. The groups of trees are rarely more than 100x30m, which in not enough to provide cover and concealment for a platoon. You are never able to maneuver in the tree covered areas. I always try to move in a straight line in the middle of the trees to avoid getting spotted, which I feel is rather silly. An example. I would like to play maps where, for example, the eastern part is a "forest" (no vehicles allowed ), a village or some houses in the western/middle part of the map and the rest of the map have groups of trees here and there. It would give you some options with your inf. Napoleon1944 - I'm not talking about graphics and btw, I like golf courses. ------------------ It gets better each time as long as it's never with the same woman. Al Bundy

Splinty - I will do that. However, I also like to set up a fresh QB every night and I don't like it the way it is now. I want more trees and shorter los.

When playing a QB, I prefer to play with as much tree coverage and short los as possible. However, I do not think the tree coverage is enough no matter how I set the parameters. There are groups of trees scattered all over the map, some tall pines, some heavy woods, but without covering a larger area. I would like to see "forests" covering larger areas where tanks can't reach my inf platoons. Perhaps that's the way the countryside looks like in CM's part of the world. I don't know. I'm from the northern part of Sweden myself so I'm used to real motherfu%¤%&/ng forests and not isolated groups of trees. So what do I want? Hmmm, I just want to know what you guys think. Should there be more parameters to choose from from? For example, "forest" or...? ------------------ It gets better each time as long as it's never with the same woman. Al Bundy

I want CM condoms. ------------------ It gets better each time as long as it's never with the same woman. Al Bundy