Jump to content

Airsupport - how is it represented?


Peerke

Recommended Posts

I knew one of those US advisors. He also served as a battalion commander during WW2. Also served in Nam. Retired as a BG. Passed away a few years.

Well it means what it says.

The CIA either directly or via some proxies supplied them with Stingers and other weapons to help them in their war against the Soviets.

Of course US Foreign Policy being as far sighted as it is, they didn't realise that the "enemy of my enemy" now would become more simply "my enemy" a couple of decades later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bodkin,

Correct, but Stingers were much easier to transport. From Kuperman's analysis section Initial Impact in Hist2004's post here. (Fair use)

http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?125913-The-Real-Charlie-Wilson

the weapon more of a liability than an asset.” It was especially ill-suited to Afghanistan’s mountainous terrain, since “the long, heavy, cumbersome barrel had to be positioned across the animal, making it impossible to go through defiles, where it snagged on every bush.”

Regards,

John Kettler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...