aka_tom_w Posted October 13, 2005 Share Posted October 13, 2005 Originally posted by gunnergoz: So---nobody's heard of Celles? 2nd US Armored vs 2nd Panzer Division? Tanks, tanks, tanks...oh and did I mention tanks, halftracks, SP artillery, etc, etc? I think that one would, er, rock. While researching this on the web I found this OLD game text saved for posterity Commodore 64 The goal of Project 64 is to preserve Commodore 64 related documents in electronic text format that might otherwise cease to exist with the rapid advancement of computer technology and declining interest in 8- bit computers on the part of the general population. Extensive efforts were made to preserve the contents of the original document. However, certain portions, such as diagrams, program listings, and indexes may have been either altered or sacrificed due to the limitations of plain vanilla text. Diagrams may have been eliminated where ASCII-art was not feasible. Program listings may be missing display codes where substitutions were not possible. Tables of contents and indexes may have been changed from page number references to section number references. Please accept our apologies for these limitations, alterations, and possible omissions. Document names are limited to the 8.3 file convention of DOS. The first characters of the file name are an abbreviation of the original document name. The version number of the etext follows next. After that a letter may appear to indicate the particular source of the document. Finally, the document is given a .TXT extension. The author(s) of the original document and members of Project 64 make no representations about the accuracy or suitability of this material for any purpose. This etext is provided "as-is". Please refer to the warantee of the original document, if any, that may included in this etext. No other warantees, express or implied, are made to you as to the etext or any medium it may be on. Neither the author(s) nor the members of Project 64 will assume liability for damages either from the direct or indirect use of this etext or from the distribution of or modification to this etext. Therefore if you read this document or use the information herein you do so at your own risk. ********* The Project 64 etext fo the ~Breakthrough in the Ardennes manual~, converted to etext by Vincent <vcsfu@is1.hk.super.net>. ARDENN10.TXT, July 1997, etext #260# ********* BREAKTHROUGH IN THE ARDENNES MANUAL ======================= interesting: By December 27, the 2nd Panzer Division had been mauled by the U.S. and 2nd Armored Division near Celles and had to retreat back to Rockhefort. The 9th Panzer was attacking the 84th Infantry near Marche. The 9th SS Panzer had pushed the 82nd Airborne which was now holding a line from Trois Ponts to Manhay. The U.S. 4th Armored Division managed to open a narrow corridor into Bastogne and had linked up with the valiant defenders of the 101st Airborne. On the south flank the Germans held positions across the Sure River against attacks by the 80th, 26th and 35th Infantry Divisions. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zalgiris 1410 Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 Thanks for the link slightly interesting...and the point of your post Tom is what? That BFI is going backwards in which way exactly? :confused: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.