xwormwood Posted May 6, 2006 Share Posted May 6, 2006 I would like to hear some other opinions about the airspace of neutral countries. I am pretty sure that most of the neutral countries in WW2 at least tried to prevent that fighting countries used there airspace (forcing enemy planes to land and be interned afterward). In SC 1 & 2 we fly laughing & unharmed over switzerland & co. Shouldn't there be a penalty (political?) when the souvereign airspace of a neutral country gets violated? Maybe it should be possible to set waypoints for air-attacks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzerkeil Posted May 6, 2006 Share Posted May 6, 2006 Switzerland was very jealous of its airspace. There was one incident in which the Swiss air force forced some German intruders to land. What was most ironic in this particular incident was that the Swiss interceptors were ME-109's which had been recently delivered to the Swiss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xwormwood Posted May 6, 2006 Author Share Posted May 6, 2006 yeah, this is one of some other stories i got in mind when i started this topic... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheese Panzer Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 So should there be a strength point loss (interred aircraft), a political penalty (country in question moves towards the opponent) or both? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mike Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 It was all completely minor in terms of losses - you just shouldn't be able to do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lars Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Originally posted by xwormwood: In SC 1 & 2 we fly laughing & unharmed over switzerland & co. We do? My planes always went around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts