SeaMonkey Posted September 15, 2007 Share Posted September 15, 2007 Sorry guys, I just can't logically come up with an explanation how Copenhagen port should give Axis 10 supply to an HQ landed in southern Sweden. Likewise with Gibraltar supplying north Africa. So tell me, am I being obstinate, or is this truly a stretch of abstraction? Someone please convince me with a reasonable argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Posted September 15, 2007 Share Posted September 15, 2007 SeaMonkey the one in Sweden was probably originally designed around the old basis of SC1 where Copenhagen Port gave supply to Scandanavia. Something to do with game balance Really doesn't matter much for SC2, there are circumstances but rarely... Gibraltar I think was designed with similar charateristics and I also feel that the designer team was seeing that it may have possessed more value than it does, but it is just a very tiny value that connects and can be useful for reinforcement, "mostly" There are some other interesting possibilities I'd prefer looking into like Supplying Leningrad over Lake Lagoda.. special rule making that a more even deadly fortress as it's quite easy to neutralize if you can surround it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts