Kuniworth Posted September 26, 2003 Share Posted September 26, 2003 Ok on request from JerseyJohn I wrote down the statistics in this field. Ive tried to point out the offender in each case. When it was not possible and the reason was an off-topic discussion I wrote this down as locked by discussion. STATISTICS LOCKED THREADS september 25, 2003 Total threads in forum; 2808 Locked threads; 165 Percentage 5,87% Locked due to longer/maybe off-topic discussion; Around 30-40 Locked due to single individual; 100+ MAIN CULPRITS(Threads directly related to single individual. Rank, name, threads, status) Top 16 1. Kuniworth 29 Active 2. Lucky Zebra 14 Banned 3. JerseyJohn 9 Active 4. Commi18/Polishbrucelee 8 Retired 5. Immer Etwas 6 Lurking 6. Jon J Rambo 6 Active 7. Carl von Mannerheim 5 Lurking 8. Les the Sarge 4 retired BriantheWise 4 retired Lucky Zorba 4 Active 9. Seawolf48 3 lurking Bullwinkle 3 lurking tylerS 3 retired EB 3 retired Bernard Honing 3 retired Hueristic 3 lurking OTHERS OF INTEREST 2 locked up thread ZappSweden - active Comrade Trapp - active 1 locked up thread JP Wagner - lurking Jim Boggs - lurking Bloodybucket - retired Mincks - retired Gaylord Focker - lurking Waltero - retired disorder - retired/lurking [ September 25, 2003, 06:15 PM: Message edited by: Kuniworth ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyJohn Posted September 26, 2003 Share Posted September 26, 2003 Great Work Kuni! I recognize the new figure in place of my earlier claim of 37 -- I was suffering from Delusions of Grandeur! My hat is off to you Sir, you are clearly the undisputed Sultan of this much misunderstood art form. Long Live the King! Superb breakdown raising the category to complete respectability. [ September 25, 2003, 06:20 PM: Message edited by: JerseyJohn ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuniworth Posted September 26, 2003 Author Share Posted September 26, 2003 Jersey I believe you are responsible for twice your number by drifting threads off-topic. But it´s hard relating stuff to a single individual so your style is at disadvantage here. But keep up the good work. I will soon add stats for 2003 counting from the christmas riot. Locked thread percentage should be much higher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyJohn Posted September 26, 2003 Share Posted September 26, 2003 Thanks Champ, good to know I've been doing my part in this great work even where it doesn't show in the stats. I think EB and dgaad were the best at getting other people's threads locked up with their ongoing livid hatred for each other. All they had to do was post something and within the hour there'd be a locked Thread. Ah, the Golden Age! Looking forward to the updated figures. [ September 25, 2003, 06:35 PM: Message edited by: JerseyJohn ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuniworth Posted September 26, 2003 Author Share Posted September 26, 2003 Ok here are the latest stats for 2003; From december 30th 2002 - september 25th 2003 Number of threads; 1124 Locked up threads; 94 = 8,3% Conclusion; almost every tenth thread is locked with the current SC generation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyJohn Posted September 26, 2003 Share Posted September 26, 2003 From under 5.87% to almost 8.3% !!! Of course these stats include You-Know-Who's (every time I write his name the Thread gets nuked!) insane rampage. Good News for The Virtual Padlock Combine. [ September 25, 2003, 07:04 PM: Message edited by: JerseyJohn ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuniworth Posted September 26, 2003 Author Share Posted September 26, 2003 For my fans I can give ya some interesting information; Kuniworth register date; Agust 14th, 2002 First padlocking; august 21th, 2002 First moderator to lock; MADMATT Most lockings of Kuni threads; Moon 90% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyJohn Posted September 26, 2003 Share Posted September 26, 2003 JerseyJohn Accepts his Undisputed Third Place Trophy "I'd like to thank EB and dgaad for expressing -- quite vehemently -- their mutual hatred in five of my nine Locked Threads. Those two stopped posting about the same time. I think of them as a pair of cadavers with their hands locked forever around one another's throats. Guess it's the romantic in me. "What can I say? It's an honor to be here, but there are some real heavies coming up who may pass me pretty soon. Then there's Kuni, one of those distant stars millions of lightyears off and moving away too quickly for anyone to ever catch up with. . . .. "Geez, now I'm crying! "Sorry about that but, well, you know how much this award means to me. "My thanks to the Lock-Up Academy and I just want to comment on the wisdom of holding this ceremony out doors with a low stone fence in the main gate gets padlocked unexpectedly. Most of all, I'd like to thank Martin, the infamous Moon for all his help. This Trophy is as much his as it is mine!" [ September 25, 2003, 11:08 PM: Message edited by: JerseyJohn ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuniworth Posted September 26, 2003 Author Share Posted September 26, 2003 Most destructive forum members This category is quite easy. Lucky Zebra is way ahead of all except lucky zorba. Lucky Zebra; 23 postings, 14 locked threads= 60,8% of postings render a padlocking Lucky Zorba 8 postings, 4 locked threads= around 50% Kuniworth 1108 postings, 29 padlocks = 2,6% JerseyJohn 3265 postings, 9 padlocks= 0,27% So speaking out of effectiveness and devastation Lucky Zebra is in a different division. The so called newbie uprising by Zorba will be nice to follow. Can he challenge Zebra? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuniworth Posted September 26, 2003 Author Share Posted September 26, 2003 Btw I think Moon is by far the funniest Moderator. His funny comments at the end of each threads always cracks me up. He got a good sense of humour and is underrated when it comes to beeing funny here. Martins style is to comment on the last post and finish of in style. Brilliant. My favorite. Hubert got a very neutral and strict moderator style. Often locking up off-topic discussion. MadMatt is out to crack skulls. He bans and locks without remorse in attempts to scare people from trying same stuff again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyJohn Posted September 26, 2003 Share Posted September 26, 2003 -- Great!! The % of total posts to lockups puts an interesting slant on things. I guess it would be more accurate to have total Threads originated to Total Threads Locked, but that would be a real pain to compile. In that case I'd bet Lucky Zebra would be near to 100%. [ September 25, 2003, 08:36 PM: Message edited by: JerseyJohn ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC Baxter Posted September 26, 2003 Share Posted September 26, 2003 Surely this thread is off-topic and should therefore be locked? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyJohn Posted September 26, 2003 Share Posted September 26, 2003 "What the hell is 'This makes thirty' supposed to mean? I don't know what you're talking about, Kuniworth, or whatever you said your name is, but pretending to be nuts won't do you any good in this stir. "And some guy calling himself JJ brought a cake for you. It feels kind of heavy but if you wanna get fat eating it that's your business." [ September 25, 2003, 10:49 PM: Message edited by: JerseyJohn ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuniworth Posted September 28, 2003 Author Share Posted September 28, 2003 In a later update...shuld we count lucky elephant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_j_rambo Posted September 28, 2003 Share Posted September 28, 2003 Do you have the stats for the "Lockers"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuniworth Posted September 28, 2003 Author Share Posted September 28, 2003 Nah but I guess you could say Hubert max 10 padlockings, Madmatt maybe 25% but the rest is Moon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_j_rambo Posted September 28, 2003 Share Posted September 28, 2003 Kuni --- You're right, lame stat. It depends how much they read, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hueristic Posted September 28, 2003 Share Posted September 28, 2003 Surprised this isn't moved to the "general Forum" yet. Btw I havn't been lurking I just don't pop around to much. Been busy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyJohn Posted September 28, 2003 Share Posted September 28, 2003 It's a good thread and relevant to SC because it sheds light on why these things get padlocked. -- Yes, I think we should include stats on The Elephant and anyone else who gets locked up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hueristic Posted September 29, 2003 Share Posted September 29, 2003 Looks like you can add one to both me and Comrade. LMAO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyJohn Posted September 30, 2003 Share Posted September 30, 2003 I missed ALL of that action, the whole Elephant idiocy. I just went to the third page and began working my way back through each one individually. This character was / is beyond belief. Turns out it's the same guy using different tags; lot of trouble to go through for such paltry results. Got a kick out of the responses, enjoyed the Sempri Fi Locked Threads for you and Comrade, serves the indirect purpose of limiting it to the former and future marine, kind of poetic! Kurt's penis enlargement cartoon was a riot but not the sort of thing I'd advise anyone to post. Comrade's blood was up by that idiot, glad he calmed it down. Kudos to Bill for stepping with such good advice without being overbearing and glad Comrade took it the way it was meant. Martin handled the whole thing excellently, the best I've seen, and Kudos to him as well; he didn't over react or come down on good contributors who were only venting outrage. And Kuniworth's concern over lawless padlock seekers was misunderstood, as usual. So, did this latest imbecile pass me on the All Time List? I didn't count up his total. Kuni -- Probably you're original suggestion is correct, we shouldn't count locked threads caused by spammers. They should go into a separate Hall of Shame Category instead of being mixed in with those of people not looking to be expelled. [ September 29, 2003, 07:01 PM: Message edited by: JerseyJohn ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurt88 Posted September 30, 2003 Share Posted September 30, 2003 Kurt's penis enlargement cartoon was a riot but not the sort of thing I'd advise anyone to post. You're right JJ.Was the first time I lost my temper on this forum.Next time I'll be more careful. It's just I was starting my AAR with Blashy and when my browser was back on the forum there were about ten spam threads by that ****###@&.Then he attacked me personal which really pissed me off.I was gonna say 'Jerk' like Jordy used to do but I got a bit carried away instead. Felt good for a while,but now I know best way to deal with spammers is to ignore'em. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyJohn Posted September 30, 2003 Share Posted September 30, 2003 Kurt, You had a right to get angry. I'm known for reacting hot when something gets under my skin, so I'd be the last to say it's wrong to do it. The bad thing is when some nitwit spamming trol provokes these things. Now that we know the same guy using different tags is to blame it will be easier to ignore him. I hope there's some way of tracking him down and blocking him completely, but that may not even be possible. [ September 29, 2003, 07:30 PM: Message edited by: JerseyJohn ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts