Elysian Posted August 25, 2000 Share Posted August 25, 2000 My apologies if this has been asked before... Started my first Quick Battle last night and am wondering why purchasing a Panther (196-200)is more than a Tiger(180). Is this because the Panther is actually overall a better tank? I guess the real question is: Are point values based on the relative effectiveness of the unit? Or is it possibly the cost to the country to actually produce the unit? Thanks for any input! Elysian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarmo Posted August 25, 2000 Share Posted August 25, 2000 Effectiveness is the only basis for price. Panther has stronger frontal armor and a more powerful AT gun. It's also faster. A better tank, all in all. ------------------ Now, would this brilliant plan involve us climbing out of our trenches and walking slowly towards the enemy sir? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elysian Posted August 25, 2000 Author Share Posted August 25, 2000 That's what I suspected, thanks for clearing that up. Elysian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Posted August 25, 2000 Share Posted August 25, 2000 I'll let u know how good the panther is...in my PBEM, its getting bombarded by a Jackson and a tank destroyer from >180m...don't look good hehe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts