Jump to content

Bennay

Members
  • Posts

    63
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bennay

  1. i think there needs to be a balance here like if i sent my tanks on a hunt order around a corner where i know there is going to contacts i need them to destroy and a BMP lases one he pops smoke well now i have no LOS and either need to move further forward (defeating the purpose as making them more exposed) or wait like five turns for the smoke to dissipate this really drives me crazy. 

  2. my general rule with entrenched targets is if you cant achieve fire superiority by direct fire before you assault them then its not worth it and you should just flatten them with mortars or the like if possible, the hardest part is when the missions built in a way that it forces you to take loses and coming to grips with that.

  3. on the Russian side they have purpose made rockets for the RPG-7 and the RPO launchers i think the US not using their AT-4's is to prevent a unit from expending all of its AT assets on the first building with contact in it.  In the high armour threat environment this war is taking place in one could expect they would be saved for armored targets.

  4. well playing a quick battle i noticed my BRM-3K could spot a tank past a line of trees that was a LOS blocker (could not "T" target the area)  i was able to set up an ambush on the tank with my tank hunter, not really a scientific test but worth mention.

     

    i should add this was hard spot i could "see" the tank not soft spot with "sound" markers

×
×
  • Create New...