People have been known to criticize Battlefront and CM frequently. It seems to be a great past time for those with a lot to say and little to offer.
As Wargames go, Battlefront offers a great deal of fidelity to observing "proper combat results" considering their budget and market size.
The only 3D wargame that is at all similar is Achtung Panzer Operation Star. That game however only offers Real Time without any multi-player at all.
There was another 3D Russian front game called Panzer Command Ostfront which, in my view, is just not comparable to the above.
Not to mention the attempt to port Close Combat to 3D which was called GI Combat if I recall correctly.
Armed Assault and Battlefield are first person shooters. As such they appeal to a larger market which means more revenue and more money for development. They are not wargames as such.
In my view it is remarkable that such a small company, serving such a niche group, has been able to provide such an excellent series of wargames.
They have done an excellent job of balancing resources between graphic quality and providing a believable tactical experience.
paddyusmc got a reaction from Bootie in The Scenario Depot III
paddyusmc reacted to z1812 in Graphics suck?!!?!?!
