I'll report it but, to be honest, I find it unlikely I will play QB again. I don't have much spare time to play and to spend around 1 hour setting up my forces and advancing to an empty objective gets me really annoyed. I could get rid of FOW, make sure there is some actual resistance to my attack and then restart with full FOW but this game is meant to be a simulation of combat, not much sim remains if I see where and what is defending an objective.
I was going to open a new thread about Quick battles but I'll use this one... I am very disappointed with the way the QB plays; almost every time i try to play against the AI (AI defending), the computer set its forces in some stupid corner of the map , spend 15min moving to the objective with caution just to realise there is not enemy forces in the objective or even near it, click ceasefire, check the map and find the enemy doing nothing all, all their forces occupying a few AS in a corner.
I love this game and I have spend quite a lot in all CM1 and now CMBN, but there isn't enough scenarios to play, specially if you don't like huge ones like is my case, but QB against the AI are a waste of time. I understand BF is a small independent company but man, I expect to get at least what I'm buying. The scope of the first CM was probably too big to get a good return and I understand that to do the same with CM2 would be a bad idea for business but at least I wanna get what it says in the tin.
Oh and btw I'm talking about a freshly installed CMBN with no 3rd party maps
Otto Dixlesic got a reaction from Bulletpoint in Are quick battles vs the AI worthwhile?
