mocdra

When you get a Hit at the Side that dont effect under normal real circumstances, in the Game the Tank is destroyed or inoperable.. That is not true !. The TurretSide Armor Advanceness and superior of the Abrams ( this is the Reality here) in view of the otherr tanks, than goes to Zero in the Game !. In the other CM Games .. Hull and Turret Armor Values realy important. Now in the game therere are modeled i think, or not? Greetings Mocdra

When you get a Hit at the Side that dont effect under normal real circumstances, in the Game the Tank is destroyed or inoperable.. That is not true !. The TurretSide Armor Advanceness and superior of the Abrams ( this is the Reality here) in view of the otherr tanks, than goes to Zero in the Game !. In the other CM Games .. Hull and Turret Armor Values realy important. Now in the game therere are modeled i think, or not? Greetings Mocdra

When you get a Hit at the Side that dont effect under normal real circumstances, in the Game the Tank is destroyed or inoperable.. That is not true !. The TurretSide Armor Advanceness and superior of the Abrams ( this is the Reality here) in view of the otherr tanks, than goes to Zero in the Game !. In the other CM Games .. Hull and Turret Armor Values realy important. Now in the game therere are modeled i think, or not? Greetings Mocdra

I have played the Demo yesterday and noticed at the Armor Display that,the Side Armor( here i mean the Turret Armor) of the M1 Tanks is to weak modeled against Big Caliber Weapons and at Missiles. There is a yellow Dot ( for Average Armor )instead a Green small cross ( For Good Armor) This with the weak Side Armor is true at the Nato Leopard2 and Challenger Tanks an the Russian T-XX Models but not by the M1 Series. The Turret Side Armor has nearly the same thickness as the Frontal Turret Armor! In the Game the M1 has the Same Side Armor Values as a t72. This is not true or correct Note the Welding Lines at the Turret Roof of an Abrams Tank. Imho that shows the Armor Thickness at the Turret. Following a example because i cant find good Turretroof Pictures from the Abrams Following a picture link to an Armor Diagram from The Leopard 2a4 and a Roof Pic. Note the Welding lines an then the Armor thickness. What do you see? Armor diagram http://www.btvt.narod.ru/4/l2.files/leo2armor.gif Pic http://www.panzerbaer.de/types/pix/bw_kpz_leopard_2_a0-004.jpg Now are you know what i mean with the welding lines and the Armor thickness Greetings Mocdra Only the Hull Side Armor is very weak (Sideskirts and 60 mm reinforced Steel with a inlaying ceramic plate only). That have been discovered on Attack with 12,7 mm AT Munitions at close in Range in Iraq. The Bullet penetrates the Sideskirt thenthe Armor,goes trough the whole Tank to the other Armor side and penetrates it to the half. http://www.fprado.com/armorsite/abrams.htm

I have played the Demo yesterday and noticed at the Armor Display that,the Side Armor( here i mean the Turret Armor) of the M1 Tanks is to weak modeled against Big Caliber Weapons and at Missiles. There is a yellow Dot ( for Average Armor )instead a Green small cross ( For Good Armor) This with the weak Side Armor is true at the Nato Leopard2 and Challenger Tanks an the Russian T-XX Models but not by the M1 Series. The Turret Side Armor has nearly the same thickness as the Frontal Turret Armor! In the Game the M1 has the Same Side Armor Values as a t72. This is not true or correct Note the Welding Lines at the Turret Roof of an Abrams Tank. Imho that shows the Armor Thickness at the Turret. Following a example because i cant find good Turretroof Pictures from the Abrams Following a picture link to an Armor Diagram from The Leopard 2a4 and a Roof Pic. Note the Welding lines an then the Armor thickness. What do you see? Armor diagram http://www.btvt.narod.ru/4/l2.files/leo2armor.gif Pic http://www.panzerbaer.de/types/pix/bw_kpz_leopard_2_a0-004.jpg Now are you know what i mean with the welding lines and the Armor thickness Greetings Mocdra Only the Hull Side Armor is very weak (Sideskirts and 60 mm reinforced Steel with a inlaying ceramic plate only). That have been discovered on Attack with 12,7 mm AT Munitions at close in Range in Iraq. The Bullet penetrates the Sideskirt thenthe Armor,goes trough the whole Tank to the other Armor side and penetrates it to the half. http://www.fprado.com/armorsite/abrams.htm

I have played the Demo yesterday and noticed at the Armor Display that,the Side Armor( here i mean the Turret Armor) of the M1 Tanks is to weak modeled against Big Caliber Weapons and at Missiles. There is a yellow Dot ( for Average Armor )instead a Green small cross ( For Good Armor) This with the weak Side Armor is true at the Nato Leopard2 and Challenger Tanks an the Russian T-XX Models but not by the M1 Series. The Turret Side Armor has nearly the same thickness as the Frontal Turret Armor! In the Game the M1 has the Same Side Armor Values as a t72. This is not true or correct Note the Welding Lines at the Turret Roof of an Abrams Tank. Imho that shows the Armor Thickness at the Turret. Following a example because i cant find good Turretroof Pictures from the Abrams Following a picture link to an Armor Diagram from The Leopard 2a4 and a Roof Pic. Note the Welding lines an then the Armor thickness. What do you see? Armor diagram http://www.btvt.narod.ru/4/l2.files/leo2armor.gif Pic http://www.panzerbaer.de/types/pix/bw_kpz_leopard_2_a0-004.jpg Now are you know what i mean with the welding lines and the Armor thickness Greetings Mocdra Only the Hull Side Armor is very weak (Sideskirts and 60 mm reinforced Steel with a inlaying ceramic plate only). That have been discovered on Attack with 12,7 mm AT Munitions at close in Range in Iraq. The Bullet penetrates the Sideskirt thenthe Armor,goes trough the whole Tank to the other Armor side and penetrates it to the half. http://www.fprado.com/armorsite/abrams.htm