Jump to content

CSS

Members
  • Posts

    253
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CSS

  1. ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

  2. I have had the fortune to have been born at a unique time in history, where I saw the passsing of the two world wars from the safe distance as a historian, my real life in the Green Berets was in the entire Reagan era.

    Playing War vs real war? Playing is much better even than a Banana war. Yet Hubert has fairly well mastered the art of full global warfare, not only militarily with all the major componets of said forces (Air , Land , Sea) but has incorperated economics, politics, and supply, expireance , and moral superbly!I am full blooded German. I give Hubert the proper salute!

    Thank you Hubert my 4000+ library, would not get near the use with my friends , were it not for some of the many discussions we have while PBEMing our nightly turn of Nupremals Global war scenario!

    Secondly Nupremal, The gods smiled on us when you produce these amazing and incredable scnarios that are true moster games that we thre play night after night doing one turn per night. The effort you put in these labors of love enrich our lives and my friends knowledge of history due to the inevitable debates.

    If EVER you guys are in TEXAS and need a place to stay, my house is open to you and Steaks and Margaritas are on me!

    Thank you both!!!

  3. Death Head I can actually semi see your agrument here, you are talking about a ubiversal tactical application that covers ALL units involved in the war VS an extremely small chrome application.

    This idea has merits but would be interesting to see if you can apply stratiegicaly, I do not mean to rag you in post I disagree with you on, it is there is a unbridgeable gap between Tactical and Stratiecic. I will gladly cheerleader any innovative Modding the makes for a more diverse and interesting provided we keep it in scale perportinal to the scale of the game.

  4. You need a tactical sqaud leader type game for these units this is a GRAND STRATEGY game. There were neary 12,000,000 men in the German Army. In the entire Radar sites there where about 27,000. A corp is roughly 30,000 to 90,000 men, an Army is 100,000 to 250,000.

    Please read up on the scale of size before you request Tactical applications to a Grand Stratiegic scale game.

    Heros of Stalingrad would be equal to all your suggestions.

  5. Not really trying to create a I said you said thingy here. I am just trying to define there is a huge unimaginable gap between tactical and stratiegic. All of the implimentations you are seeking are already in the game on a stratiegic level, not tactical.

    But Hitler absolutly had ZERO stratiegic sense at all that is why we lost the war, he knew war at a tactical level, and actually could operationally deploy a division, but statiegy let alone Grand Stratiegy was compltetly beyond him.

    The unit of time in this game is nearly 2 weeks per turn. I spent 8 years in Special forces in the US Army. We deploy Stratiegicaly, but all of our operation were stictly tactical and low level deployment.

    A night raid/bombing mission is ALWAYS tactical.

  6. Again on the night warfare thingy. On the Grand Strategic Scale it is encompassed into things like +1 naval warfare, tanks ,aircraft ect.

    Grand strategey= Funding Home building in the whole USA.

    Strategic sacle=Funding Home building in easter or western USA

    Operrational scale=Funding Home bulding in Texas

    Deployment scale= Building homes in Dallas

    Tactical scale= Bulding a home in Dallas

    Night wafare is the equivlant of using a 3# hammer VS a 2# hammer actually building a house. In the context the game is GRAND STRATEGIC!

  7. I still have an issue of the pacific map. When Japan sign the non aggression all is good. When Germany declares war Japan can also go to war no problem. THERE SHOULD BE RUSSIAN FORCES ON THE PACIFIC MAP!!!! Russia had a large military presense in the far east. If Japan declares war the forces appear. But if they join the german assualt all this territory is empty.

    These troops dissapear completly, there is no siberian event during the winter in western USSR. THEY SIMPLY are not there in this scenario. I can not agree with worm wood that it is a matter of me garrisoning the area. THESE TROOPS EXISTED and should not just vanish.

    Secondly if the game is allowing german planes in China. Allied planes should be allowed in Russia. Playing PVP in this scenario Russia is hard pressed.

    Nupreaml canyou modify this?

  8. In our game I suddenly see german fighters in China and eastern Russia. At best this is gamey, as the allies can not put aircraft in Russia. I would like to not see German aircraft in the pacific.

    Secondly, when Japan signs the Russian non aggression pact it should be binding. In all our game Japan signs it the when Germany attacks Japan marches/airbornes in to the undefended Russin cities,and Russia gets no units in Siberia, or the Zuchkov event in western Europe.

  9. Having spent 8 years in the 12th Group special forces. I wish to rebut some of Rambos concepts. I was Airborne every time we did a jump there were injuries. A night jump tripled those injuries easily.

    Rebuiding dead units at half price is completely correct. Seldom do entire units die especialy at the corp/amry level. They are reffited and rebuilt. Sections, squads, platoon, even companies can be wiped out but larger units such as battalions, regiments , divisions on up dont just disappear.

    Most other items I agree to semi agree with Rambo is a great guy and a legend on these boards.

×
×
  • Create New...