Jump to content

The_Enigma

Members
  • Posts

    723
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The_Enigma

  1. I dont quite fully understand the concept of because someone is a volunteer he will preform better then others, ok i can see it over people who have been conscript and prehaps dont agree with the war or just dont want to fight etc but what about in comparison to the regulars, the guys who have been in alot longers - lifers or even those who have already seen combat?

    Does "calibre" really get involved when you got some dude across the field shooting 10 pounds of poop out of you with a machine gun (ala the Somme, heres better of the 50+ thousand casulties that day a good deal where volunteers)?

  2. Originally posted by Michael Dorosh:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by AdamL:

    Are you suggesting infantry are deliberately under-equipped as far as weapon lethality is concerned?

    No.

    I'm suggesting they kill more people in the movies than they do in real life. smile.gif

    I'm sure the training emphasized lethality in the Second World War. The training manuals were very bloody minded. The Canadian Army Training Memorandum constantly harped on the need for men to kill; Montgomery talked of it often as well. In the field, it was harder to make it an imperative. Men would rather use grenades or artillery than get in close with a Sten or knife and make sure. </font>

  3. At any rate that stubby little gun kicks the crap out of every tank you come across (yes including KV Tanks ... just need to blast them with enough HE to force the crew to bail).

    :D

    the Brits added the "heavily armoured "Infantry" tank to eth mix, but it was the same - a small calibre AT gun supported by a few 3" gunned HE/smoke chuckers.
    Thats one i still havnt got my head around, for there intended use why didnt they give them all some form of howizter?
  4. Originally posted by z-warfare:

    Having a close look at Strachwitz at Kursk right now, boy is it big. I think there are many good ideas there, especially with how the AI can use ATGs.

    I'm too lazy to test run my own operation myself, but what happens when you add fortifications as reinforcements? I assume you can just place them wherever you like at the setup of the battle you get them? I want some mobile obstacle detachments, see...

    Maybe this should be in scenario talk.

    Seriously too lazy to set up a small test operation and quickly play through it ... takes all of 5 minutes!

    So a quick not even 5 minutes of testing will reveal that if fortifications, pillboxes etc are added as scheduled reinforcements they will appear in whatever battle you scheduled them to arrive in and they can be deployed as you said wherever you like.

    Appear, the other reinforcements types, such as link to map also work. No ideas on Battalion etc reverse as I didn’t test them.

  5. Am reading Panzer Operations currently and the author is describing some counterattack several panzer and panzergrenadeir divisions have just launched.

    He notes that the Soviet minefields where spotted by the luftwaffe so the 2 Corps of 5 divisions were able to skirt around them.

    How exactly can a minefield be spotted by planes?

  6. That said, the main reason T-34/85 is effective in the Message from Goetz scenario is that the Soviet can get good gun density, and typically Panthers get tagged because several T-34s are firing on them at once.

    And as EG said, the Soviet numbers.

    In my game, after losing quite a number of T34s i was able to push forth with practically every single one of them with move to contact orders so they all halted and started firing.

    There was a very nice momment when a massive bunch of them fired at the same time :D

  7. Tigers, not King Tigers ;)

    You may want to check out a scenario on the scenario depot called Strachwitz at Kursk.

    The guys who made that iirc said it was very thoughly researched. That features Panthers, Tigers, MK IVs, MK IIIs all fighting together pushing forth on a map made up of Soviet AT batteries.

    I dunno it made provide some ideas ?

  8. Originally posted by Earl Grey:

    The glacis plate is just the frontal armor.

    By the way, the T-34 in 'Message from Goetz' have a disproportionate amount of APCR rounds - some tanks even as much as 7. Those punch through a Panther's armor like butter and engagement ranges in that scenario are well under 500m (at least when I played it) - if you're not constantly moving backwards.

    You should have seen the tank graveyard before i punched through the German tanks ... :(
  9. The A model (no "early") on the other hand starts to show the late war Panther pattern. It has the Nahv. close defense system, as do all later models. It loses the side skirts. And its armor quality is rated "occasional flaws in upper hull front". In practice that means Russian 122mm AP can kill them with upper front hull hits *sometimes*. (Brit 17 pdr and US 90mm are similar).
    I think My Panthers would disagree with that ... too many times have they went up in flames from a 85mm round which has punched stright on through its uper turret :(

    If you play that Message from Geotz, you end up wiping out a bunch of Panzer Gs with with 85mm guns, sides kills, front kills, hail fire kills etc

×
×
  • Create New...