Jump to content

Colonel J Lee

Members
  • Posts

    207
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Colonel J Lee

  1. Hi Schrullenhaft,

    You helped me with the Nvidia Control Panel Settings a few years ago (for my GeForce 7600GT card), and it was VERY helpful (antialiasing, supersampling, textures, etc.). I have a new card for my back up computer, a GeForce 8400GS (512) card. Can you give me the optimum settings for this card?

    I have jaggies on the CMAK and CMBB vehicles and other units and would like to get rid of them. This card should be good enough to run without them, right?

    Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

  2. CORRECTION: the "display" tab on the menu bar under the display category does NOT read "identify profile" but rather "identify display". I need to figure out if my GeForce 7600 GT is compatible with a widescreen (for 'native resolution') according to another web site. PLEASE HELP! Thanks much!

  3. Yikes, I could not find anything under "Display" in the NVidia driver's control panel except a drop-down that read, "identify profile" which, when selected, gave me a black screen with a big number 1 on it. I can't see options for scaling anywhere. Frustrating.

    Redwolf, I'm not a geek with computers, so maybe you could give the steps for both options? I would GREATLY appreciate it. I would hate to return the monitor because it doesn't work with combat mission. I suspect it's a user problem!

  4. Redwolf,

    I just hooked up a new 19" wide screen LCD (Acer) to my computer. The combat mission vehicles look slightly "stretched" (i.e., the Shermans look longer and lower and so do all the other vehicles). It's not really bad, but I had a perfect situation with my square 17" Sceptre. I thought it would be an upgrade to have this 19" wide Acer.

    My current display setting is 1024x768. I have a GeForce 7600GT card and the graphics are crystal clear, but.......I have tried different display settings and can't seem to get the right (near perfect) look of the units. Any clue on what I can do to?

  5. It seem unthinkable that BF would not tell us 'it's dead' if they KNOW it's dead. :confused: That would equate to intentionally ticking off some of your most loyal customers. :mad: I think they are trying to put it together and MAY not pull it off. Hence, no announcements for a long time. That's my take.

    If they do it successfully, great. :D If not, they will probably announce (explain) that they tried but couldn't do it for whatever host of reasons. But to know it's dead, say nothing, and just make your customers wait forever? That would be horrible business practice. :eek: I would hate for that to be the case; the company has been very good and has produced some products (CM, e.g.) that have provided WW2 buffs like us with a lot of enjoyment...and good support.

  6. Thanks Philippe,

    Actually, I love CMMODS and have downloaded quite a bit of graphics MODS from there, but did not think to check for wav mods until after posting! There are a few; very few. There is one under a file name of something-maxim and it has some music and one or two voice files. Oh, well. Thanks for the suggestion.

  7. Hey John,

    The MBI book gives the following (exact) information:

    BT-2: 70 mph (wheels); 40 mph (tracks)

    BT-5: 70 mph (wheels); 40 mph (tracks)

    BT-7: 45 mph (wheels); 31 mph (tracks)

    Evidently, the difference between our two references (books) is 2 mph with respect to the BT-7 operating on tracks.

    Ironically, my book (or one with similar specifications for this AFV) appears to have been used by BFC for giving the BT-7 its max speed. Close enough either way. The earlier BT models (2 and 5) were evidently faster! Thanks for weighing in, John.

  8. Great answer, Jason. I thought as I posted, "I have a feeling Jason C. is going to jump on this".

    The book I referenced does have the higher speeds for the earlier BTs, like you said 45mph and 70mph (!!!), but that makes a lot of sense to be in the 30s with tracks. You're right, though; 31 seems too low. But I feel better about this now. When I saw the OOB for the scenario I'm playing as Russians, I thought, "man, I've got to try an end-run down the flank with those quick buggers". Might still try it - I've got about 20 of them to work with. Of course I'll have to lay a lot smoke to cover these tin-foil wrapped machines.

  9. Yes, Philippe. All good points you made. I was just thinking in terms of having those files if the web sites go down (like Der Kessel, for e.g.). It's nice to have them at hand for oneself if you cannot even remember where you found them the first time. And moving them from a CD to your game folders is easier than downloading them all over again. Of course, ideally it would be nice, in a perfect world, to have a web site that would ALWAYS be there for all these things!

  10. J.R.

    You make a good point. I probably should not have said 'I hope it goes down in flames', since it is working for some people. At any rate, I still don't like it, but maybe it just needs time to have the bugs and kinks worked out. All in all, XP seems to be a better operating system though. Hopefully, Hari will get his issues worked out with the Tech guys. Peace.

  11. I'm glad because I hate Vista and I hope more and more games don't work on it and it goes down the crapper. Bill Gates is just trying to gouge everyone again for more money. Vista doesn't do enough of anything in an improvement to warrant moving away from XP. He just made up that direct X 10 to not be compatible to XP to force everyone to upgrade, but, it's backfiring on him. News reports say so and the general public is demanding the ability to buy a new computer with XP instead of Vista now. Hurray for boycotting.
    I can't agree more. I bought a great computer package from Costco with Vista and hated it so much I returned the next morning after setting it up half the night before. I love XP Pro and it works great with EVERYTHING, especially CMAK, CMETO and CMBB. What else do I need? I hope Vista goes down in flames for good. Why did we need to change at all in the first place?!
×
×
  • Create New...