Jump to content

gunnergoz

Members
  • Posts

    2,933
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by gunnergoz

  1. Seems that about 20 years after a war, some creative film maker often decides he's going to "tell it like it was", i.e. how he imagined it was, which is often in marked contrast to the wartime and immediate postwar films that are usually very patriotic and gung-ho. This happened about 20 years after WW2, and again after Korea and Vietnam, each war having films that were to some degree revisionistic being made quite some time after the shooting was over.

    Hollywood tends to see everything through some sort of filter that seems to warp reality, be it in contemporary or postwar films. Even Audie Murphy couldn't get Hollywood to make a truly realistic war movie: as much as he tried, "To Hell and Back" still had all the typical Hollywood hoo-rah stuff in it, though many parts of it did come from Murphy's wartime experiences. Lee Marvin had a bit better luck with his "Big Red One" but that was a long time later and it was nowhere near as melodramatic as was Audie's film, which was a product of the 50's when WW2 was still seen through more idealistic filters.

    Modern film making seems to be taking a different course. Not entirely sure if it is because the wars seem to go on forever nowdays, or because the internet makes it difficult to easily categorize wartime experience into simplistic black and white events.

  2. The Italian army in the interwar years was filled with a lot of geriatric generals and young officers who received little practical mentoring, beyond perhaps hearing veterans' war stories from "La Grande Guerra" (as they called WW1.) Many of the men in the ranks had relatively poor educations, coming from the working class, and in some cases, spoke different dialects from their officers, who were generally drawn from the ranks of the middle and upper classes. NCO ranks existed, but were not so much professionals as "lifers" who were expected to do little more than pass on the orders of the officers. There was not much mingling between officers and enlisted - again, class tended to work against them. The officers were better paid and coddled with better food, faster mail service, etc. The disparities created a gap that tended to break down unit cohesion under the stress of combat. Mussolini's administration tended to simply put tinsel on the tree, so to speak, and did almost nothing to prepare the army for war.

    BTW, BFC: were the Italian voices done by native speakers of Italian? They seem pretty stilted and not at all comfortable with the language. Some of the words were actually mispronounced. This was a bit of a let down.

  3. (snip)
    • Tankettes destroyed easily

    • Recon vehicle is almost useless, it's a large convertable car with a 20mm gun. NO protection at all. Get any where within enemy range and you'll take losses quickly. But the sound of the 20mm firing is awesome.(snip)

    Yep, keep them tankettes well out of range of anything bigger than a pistol or carbine. .30 cal AP seems to go right through them, which means a rifleman theoretically can take one out...in practice it takes at least a BAR or LMG to do it from what I've seen so far.

    The scout car is totally unarmored so needs to be hull down and if it is going against anything with a .30 or .50 cal MG, it better have the first shot! But it does a bang up job on infantry if the infantry does not have LMG's with them.

  4. I would like the 1985 thing too except I to this day still find it terrifying to contemplate the what-if. As a US Army dependent/brat in Europe in the 50's and 60's, my friends and I lived in constant worry that the real balloon might go up someday; we dependent families were actually being prepared for it by the Army with various exercises, rehearsals and training programs. Then, in the 80's, I was in the military myself and got to worry about it in a different light, as a potential protagonist and not simply a bystander.

    OK, its just a game, but it is still creepy for me nonetheless. (Which doesn't mean I wouldn't buy it, I'd just have to have a healthy toot of my favorite libation before sitting down to play.)

    BTW did I mention that I married "one of the enemy?" :D My (formerly Ukrainian) wife served in the Red Army about the same time that I was in the US Navy, chasing her country's submarines all over the place. Life is a hoot.

  5. Did you know Soviet troops were not issued socks? Did you know that drunk while on duty was a serious problem. Did you know that these 2 year concripts often picked cabbage and potatoes instead of training? All claimed by Suvarov.

    1. Traditionally, Russian troops were issued long cloths to use as foot bindings, which were wrapped around the foot and ankle in a specific way. They were said to be superior to (often poorly made) socks. Don't know how long the practice lasted, but I'm fairly sure it was well into the postwar era.

    Link: http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?133843-Russian-foot-bindings-and-technique

    2. Drunk on duty is only a problem if you define it a problem. In Russia, no problem...until you embarrass some general.

    3. It is said that early satellite photo analysts looked for the telltale sign of Soviet collective farm workers whose shaved heads glinted sunlight back into space, as an indication that that year's class of conscripts had been sent off to pick up the harvest - again.

  6. Avatar: In space, no one can hear you pontificate.

    It seems like SF films are often used to convey some sort of subtext; a semi-subliminal message warning of one dark future or another, which can be read by reading between the lines of dialog and viewing fairly unambiguous visible cues. Still, I enjoy the heck out of the better ones and especially love a good bug hunt or first contact story.

    Next up: NATO/WP take on the Alien Invaders! :D Oh, sorry, that's been done already: Independence Day...

  7. I do hope there will be an early war East Front pack out at some point. I'd love to try to hold off the invading panzers with my few KV-1's and -2's and hordes of little T-26's. Then later could come the battles for Moscow and Stalingrad. Ah, I can't wait...

  8. Well, in my limited understanding of the situation, apparently Ukraine is a candidate to join NATO, obviously making Russia quite unhappy. Additionally Russia is medling in Ukraine and there was a recent push to adopt Russian as the official language in Ukraine, obviously upsetting a lot of Ukranians. NATO has also been pushing to get a missle defense system set up in Ukraine. So, the seeds of conflict are starting to germinate.

    Also, remember not long ago the whole deal with Georgia - South Ossetia and Russian tanks rolling in there quite rapidly with NATO supporting the other side.

    Ukraine's current leadership is very corrupt and totally out to gut the country for its own enrichment. It plays with Russian nationalism to get support in the Eastern Ukraine, in part to counter the Ukrainian nationalism that is prevalent in the Western half of the country. Unfortunately, this current crop of bosses has learned to use the state's security apparatus to suppress dissent - note the very public jailing of Yulia Tymoshenko and other political dissidents - and corral in the media. So a repeat of the Orange Revolution is not likely given this regime's very heavy handed suppression of public displays of discontent. The military is still mostly conscript, though, and it is doubtful it would hold together if the regime decided to start shooting down people in the streets.

    Joining NATO? Becoming part of the European Union? Not a chance. Not until this regime is long gone and the country manages to get some breathing space. Big brother Russia is also a factor, though intervention a la Georgia/Ossetia is not very likely - Ukrainians would resist that quite vigorously. But they will continue to play footsies with Putin, if for no other reason than they need Russia's natural gas if they want warm homes in the winter.

    I suppose if you have to design a wargame around it, you could posit a situation where Russia does intervene - say in Eastern Ukraine - on behalf of a tottering, pro-Russian government, and the Western part of the country (which includes the capital, Kiev) might conceivably request NATO assistance to re-unify the nation and eject the Russian "intruders." Not likely, but a scenario does not have to be authentic, just plausible.

  9. After the Battle would be hard to beat, especially the first couple of years that they published...if you can find those issues.

    Michael

    Very true, Michael

    I have several of their books...the ones on Panzers in Normandy and Battle of the Bulge are just crammed full of battles, maps, images (then and now of course) and lots of loving details by history grogs that know their stuff.

    panzers_in_normandy.jpgbattle_of_bulge.jpg

    Just go to afterthebattle.com and drool a bit. US orders have to go through RZM.com but they too are well worth a visit. When I win the lotto, I plan to clean out RZM's warehouse. :D

×
×
  • Create New...