Jump to content

Cueball

Members
  • Posts

    138
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by Cueball

  1. Ironically, one of the first things I did after installing it wasn't playing it, it was looking at the encyclopedia. I was fascinated with the individual details of the units.

    One of the odd things I noticed was that the penetration figures appear to be off. I noticed for example, that the long barreled PZ IV (F-H) has less penetration than the M4 Sherman's short 75. I know it's picky and probably silly, but they appeared to be off in others as well, at least compared to figures I've read and seen in your Combat Mission series.

    Are the figures in the Encyclopedia representative of actual game play?

  2. The Panther’s gun not only penetrated more armor, but IIRC had lower dispersion of shot, making it a better firing platform. The Tiger’s gun fired a heavier shell, making it more effective against soft targets, and likely a greater chance of knocking out a vehicle if the shell penetrated. The Panther’s 80mm sloped glacis also protected it better than the Tiger’s 100mm.

  3. I just bought the game, and have found it frighteningly addictive. However, one of the things I noticed it that by the time my pilots earned enough XP to take a 109e, I was facing non historical match-ups in 1 vs. 1 dogfights, like the P40n. My last battle was a 109F vs P47’s … something that rarely occurred.

    I understand what the computer is doing. It’s matching up point value vs point value, but it’s putting the points into the planes instead of the pilots to make the fight even. I have discovered that by flying escort missions, it spreads the XP out to the opposition and that fixes the problem. The last battle, my 109e’s were escorting Stuka’s and facing 4 Hurricane I’s. Felt just like the Battle of Britain.

    However, I would like to do a quick 1 vs. 1 dogfight, and get something more historical. There just doesn’t seem to be a way to do it. An interesting option might be 1 vs. 2. That would spread the XP out, allow historical match-ups, and one could feel like the beleaguered Germans during much of the air war.

    I’m going to try campaign’s next, as that may be more my cup of tea. However, I wanted to point out a possible issue (match-ups) and a new option (1 vs. 2) and see what people thought.

  4. Well, in a recent QB with a good friend of mine, I certainly wished he had decided to avoid buying CAS. We were playing CMBB, and he bought one...just one, veteran IL2-3M.

    That single aircraft destroyed 5 of my tanks using a combination bombs, rockets, and strafing runs. The irony was my opponent never knew what was happening, as all my tanks were out of LOS at the time.

    CAS can truly be a nuisance to your own side when you buy it, but sometimes it can be frightfully effective.

  5. I've played this game for quite a while now, and have noticed several different effects of a crew being "shocked" --

    Stug III penetrated by a bazooka round,and the Stug just sat there for the remainder of the turn. Halfway through next turn, it continues it's plotted move.

    M10 was shocked, and sat there for remainder of game.

    Tiger crew shocked by commander hit. (I am guessing a sniper) Paused briefly and continued movement.

  6. I have a B&W G3/350, and a few days ago replaced the Rage 128 with a PCI Radeon. I'm extremely pleased with it. The new 1.1.1 drivers work well. One of the side benefits was the improved clarity of the text.

    However, I do agree with a previous post. If you have a Beige G3, a Radeon may be overkill.

    BTW - CM uses RAVE for it's 3D rendering on the Mac

  7. I found the problem!!!

    (and do I feel silly....)

    Previously, I was getting the message, "ERROR: Cannot open connection on TCP/IP network"

    When I copied the OpenPlay Modules into the CM folder, I did just that....without the folder. The modules were in the CM folder per instructions but they were not in the "OpenPlay Modules" folder. They must be in that folder in order for OpenPlay to find them. OpenPlay did not find the TCP/IP module, hence the error.

  8. Yes, I'm well aware. Since I never get to the host screen, I was surmising CM was unable to recognize that I had TCP/IP installed.

    Do you know if it's doing a port check before getting to the host screen?

    I have no firewall software installed nor a router to pass through other than my ISP's. Just the computer and the cable modem.

    I've considered installing OS 8.6 from scratch on another partition and booting from that for testing. I was hoping someone in the user community or BTS has an answer before I went to all that trouble.

×
×
  • Create New...