Jump to content

Runyan99

Members
  • Posts

    1,304
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Runyan99

  1. What does that matter? Common courtesy dictates that if you are going to post a detailed commentary of a battle that everyone is about to play for the first time you should at least put a spoiler warning somewhere on the post.

    We are all playing this demo for the first time and and feeling our way through it as if on a first date with the hot chick from high school. Who needs someone giving a blow by blow discription of the battle anyway? Its like telling us the hot chick wears falsies.

    What is this reflexive complaining?

    If you don't want scenario information, don't read an AAR. Don't click the link. It had the name of the scenario in the title. An After Action Report, will by definition, include some details of the battle covered. FYI.

    If you can't do the math on that one without the magic word 'spoiler' included, well I wonder about you.

  2. Bocage is impassable in the game. Mmm okay. I've been to Normandy. In reality, it is impassable or almost impassable in places, but not in others.

    However, there are also low English style hedgerow bushes, and I can't get infantry across them. This ain't bocage as shown. It looks 3 feet high, with no earthern berm. Why won't infantry cross this obstacle? They need to.

    In the below photo, the squad ordered to cross the bush row is instead walking aroud to the fence gate. C'mon man. The guy on the far right looks like he could fall over the obstacle.

    hedge2.jpg

  3. I've made some partial SL maps in CMSF and the difference between CMx1 and CMSF is striking. The maps also take a lot more work because there is more detail in the new maps with the 8m squares. A map that might take me a week to do in CMx1 would probably take me three or four weeks in CMSF.

    And that is why I might not be attempting to create many CMBN scenarios.

  4. Um, what? SOs link shows a clear decrease in debt-to-GDP during Clinton's reign, as does yours.

    What do you think the graphs show? :confused:

    Yeah sure that's right. I think Clinton was one of our better conservatiive Presidents, in the mold of Calvin Coolidge. The man just didn't do anything, and that was great for the country. I just don't see the slight decline over those years as material, or worth pointing out, within the context of the larger trends the graph shows. It's a big So What.

  5. In short

    1) Government created Fannie and Freddie in the interest of promoting home ownership.

    2)These agencies buy mortgages from the banks. This takes the loans off the banks books, and frees them up for another round of lending. In this way government juiced and liquified the housing market.

    3)This went on until the banks were giving loans to deadbeats. The banks didn't care because they were going to pass them on to the GSEs anyway. The government wasn't concerned as their goal was houses for everybody in the first place. In any case, a delusion developed that home prices were only heading higher. Some government luminaries like Alan Greenspan actually encourage the use of nontraditional mortgages like adjustible rate loans.

    4) eventually a day comes when a significant portion of these deadbeats (you may prefer a different term) who had an expensive house but perhaps no job could no longer afford their payments. This topples the whole ponzi scheme, and home prices begin to drop, which snowballs.

    5)government, who fed the flame all along and ignored the bad underwriting practiced in place during the boom, ignores it's own role in the whole thing, and of course posits that is what is really needed is tighter oversight and control of finance.

  6. Fine with me. All our financial markets do need regulation. Lets not abolish the SEC or the FDIC. We need both. Just don't kid yourself. The government had it's hands all over the housing crisis. Government policy put people into houses they could not afford. Period end of story. Both parties were to blame.

    Edit - By the way, you want reform? Let's see to it that Fannie and Freddie are unwound and then abolished. Let's get government out of the mortgage business.

    I'm far more interested in discussing government spending.

×
×
  • Create New...