P z B Posted October 4, 2002 Share Posted October 4, 2002 I don't think it's correct that carriers suffers a casualty rate similar to the one taken by its airgroup. A carrier is much more valuable than an airgroup and should have a casualty rate proportionate to its value. Maybe a double value would be better? One for naval strength and one for airgroup. The strength of one can't be more than the other and have to be replaced seperately! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gman Posted October 4, 2002 Share Posted October 4, 2002 Hey P z B, I agree. I think I recently read a similar suggestion at this message board. Try to seperate the airwing from the ship\battlegroup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts